Free Gingival Graft Adjunct With Low Level Laser Therapy
- Conditions
- Wounds and InjuriesTransplantsGingival Recession, LocalizedLow-Level Light Therapy
- Interventions
- Device: CheseeTM Diode LaserOther: Clinical examination
- Registration Number
- NCT03425695
- Lead Sponsor
- Abant Izzet Baysal University
- Brief Summary
The present placebo-controlled parallel design clinical study was planned to determine the effect of low level laser therapy on clinical periodontal conditions and dimensions of free gingival graft as well as postoperative pain levels in the surgical area.
- Detailed Description
Background: Shrinkage of the free gingival graft (FGG) and patient's discomfort during healing period are important concerns. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effect of low level laser therapy (LLLT) in terms of enhancing wound healing, reducing graft shrinkage and postoperative pain.
Methods: Thirty patients were randomly assigned to receive either FGG+ LLLT (test, n = 15) or FGG + placebo LLLT (control, n = 15). In the test group, a diode laser (aluminum-gallium-arsenide, 810 nm, 0.1 W, continuous mode, time of irradiation:60 s, energy density: 6 J/cm2, spot size:0.5 cm) was applied immediately after the FGG surgery and 1,3,7, and 14 days later. The control group received the same sequence of irradiation with the laser-off. Comparison of the graft surface areas between groups at 1st, 3rd and 6th months were made with an image-analyzing software. Complete wound epithelization, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score of recipient site and the number of analgesic used were evaluated after the surgery.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- Patients >18 years old
- Patients presenting Class I or II Miller gingival recession on vital incisors in the mandibular anterior region with no caries or restoration
- The included teeth had also keratinized gingiva <2 mm; PI and GI<1.
- The patients had to be systemically healthy and non-smokers.
- Patients presenting active periodontal disease and probing depth >3 mm; taking medications that would interfere with the wound-healing process or that contraindicate the surgical procedure;
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- Patients who underwent periodontal surgery in the study area;
- Patients with orthodontic therapy in progress were excluded.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Test group CheseeTM Diode Laser Free Gingival Graft (FGG) + Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) + Clinical Examination The test group received LLLT with a diode laser (CheseeTM Diode Laser, Wuhan, China ) at the FGG sites with a wavelength of 810 nm and output power of 0.1 W, for 60 s, with an energy density of 6 J/cm2 in the continuous wave mode (spot size:0.5 cm). The laser beam was directed perpendicularly toward the tissue in the noncontact mode. The laser was irradiated at the recipient sites immediately after surgery and 1, 3, 7, and 14 days later. Test group Clinical examination Free Gingival Graft (FGG) + Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) + Clinical Examination The test group received LLLT with a diode laser (CheseeTM Diode Laser, Wuhan, China ) at the FGG sites with a wavelength of 810 nm and output power of 0.1 W, for 60 s, with an energy density of 6 J/cm2 in the continuous wave mode (spot size:0.5 cm). The laser beam was directed perpendicularly toward the tissue in the noncontact mode. The laser was irradiated at the recipient sites immediately after surgery and 1, 3, 7, and 14 days later. Control group CheseeTM Diode Laser Free Gingival Graft (FGG)+Placebo Low Level Laser Therapy (PLLLT) + Clinical Examination The control group received PLLLT with a diode laser (CheseeTM Diode Laser, Wuhan, China ) same as test group without pushing the start button Control group Clinical examination Free Gingival Graft (FGG)+Placebo Low Level Laser Therapy (PLLLT) + Clinical Examination The control group received PLLLT with a diode laser (CheseeTM Diode Laser, Wuhan, China ) same as test group without pushing the start button
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Graft shrinkage 1-, 3-, and 6-months after FGG surgery The shrinkage of the graft area was calculated according to the differences between the graft area at baseline, 1st, 3rd, and 6th months.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Epithelization 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after FGG surgery Epithelization was determined via bubbling test by using 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). This test was carried out at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days after surgery.