Comparison of the Hemodynamic Safety of Two Common Alveolar Recruitment Manoeuvres With Regard to Cardiac Output in a Surgical Intensive Care Unit
Completed
- Conditions
- Positive-Pressure Respiration
- Registration Number
- NCT02805036
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens
- Brief Summary
Protective ventilation - combining a low tidal volume (between 6 and 8 ml/kg) and alveolar recruitment (AR) manoeuvres repeated every 30 minutes - is currently the standard of care for decreasing morbidity associated with mechanical ventilation.
In contrast, there is no consensus on the type of recruitment manoeuvre, which varies from one centre to another and from one study to another.
The investigators intend to compare two currently used AR techniques with regard to their ventilatory efficacy and hemodynamic safety:
* An end-tidal plateau at 30 cmH20 for 30 seconds.
* An end-tidal plateau at 10 cmH20 above the patient's plateau pressure for 30 seconds, without exceeding 30 cmH20.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
- All sedated, intubated, mechanically ventilated adult patients (over-18) admitted to the surgical intensive care unit and equipped with a central venous catheter and an arterial catheter.
- Good echogenicity
- Social security coverage
Exclusion Criteria
- Pregnancy
- Cardiac arrhythmia
- Poor echogenicity
- Legal guardianship or incarceration
- Systolic blood pressure ≤90 mmHg
- Respiratory distress
- Patients admitted on an emergency basis (first 24 hours), i.e. not for elective surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Variations in cardiac output induced by each type of AR manoeuvre Day 0
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Variations in PaO2 variations induced by each type of AR manoeuvre Day 0
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
CHU Amiens
🇫🇷Amiens, France
CHU Amiens🇫🇷Amiens, France