Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01379677
NCT01379677
Completed
Phase 3

Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease With Rubidium-82 PET and Technetium-99m-MIBI SPET: A Head to Head Comparison, Versus Coronary CT Angiography

Advanced Accelerator Applications1 site in 1 country135 target enrollmentFebruary 2011

Overview

Phase
Phase 3
Intervention
Rubidium-82
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Sponsor
Advanced Accelerator Applications
Enrollment
135
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The specificity of detecting significant coronary artery disease (as defined as being >70% stenosis, on coronary CT angiography)
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The main purpose of this study is to compare myocardial perfusion imaging using Rubidium-82 PET with Tc-99m-MIBI SPET, in the evaluation of significant Coronary Artery Disease (CAD).

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
February 2011
End Date
November 2013
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Referred for scintigraphy to assess myocardial ischaemia
  • Ability to give informed written consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Impaired capacity to consent
  • Pregnancy, or breastfeeding
  • Allergy to iv contrast
  • Renal failure
  • Severe Uncontrolled asthma
  • Claustrophobia

Arms & Interventions

Single arm

This is an Head to Head Comparison between Rubidium-82 PET and Tc-99m-MIBI SPET with CTA as gold standard. All the patients will undergo the three imaging protocols.

Intervention: Rubidium-82

Single arm

This is an Head to Head Comparison between Rubidium-82 PET and Tc-99m-MIBI SPET with CTA as gold standard. All the patients will undergo the three imaging protocols.

Intervention: Sestamibi. reconstitution with sodium pertechnetate (99mTc)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The specificity of detecting significant coronary artery disease (as defined as being >70% stenosis, on coronary CT angiography)

Time Frame: Up to 2 days

The primary objective is to compare PET vs. SPET, with the primary outcome being the specificity of detecting significant coronary artery disease (as defined as being \>70% stenosis, on coronary CT angiography).

Secondary Outcomes

  • Evaluate any adverse events or reactions, during Rubidum-82 or Tc-MIBI administration.(Up to 2 days)
  • Evaluate any difference in the clinical interpretation of the Rubidium-82 PET and Tc-99m-MIBI SPET images.(Up to 2 days)
  • Evaluate any difference in "Percentage myocardium" that is hypoperfused, between Rubidium-82 PET and Tc-99m-MIBI SPET.(Up to 2 days)
  • Evaluate any difference in image quality, artefacts and interpretative confidence between Rubidium-82 PET and Tc-99m-MIBI SPET.(Up to 2 days)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials