The Effect of Application of Proximal and Distal Upper Rehabilitation Robot With Stroke Patients
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Interventions
- Device: distal upper rehabilitation robotDevice: proximal upper rehabilitation robot
- Registration Number
- NCT04054700
- Lead Sponsor
- National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea
- Brief Summary
Comparison of the effect of upper limb rehabilitation on the application of proximal upper rehabilitation robot and distal upper rehabilitation robot with stroke patients
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 68
- Hemiplegic patients secondary to first cerebrovascular accidents
- Onset ≥ 3 months
- 29 ≤ Fugl-Meyer Assessment score
- Cognitively intact enough to understand and follow the instructions from the investigator
- History of surgery of affected upper limb
- Fracture of affected upper limb
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description distal upper rehabilitation robot distal upper rehabilitation robot experimental group that applied the distal upper rehabilitation robot proximal upper rehabilitation robot proximal upper rehabilitation robot control group that applied the proximal upper rehabilitation robot
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Wolf motor function test change from baseline at 4 weeks an activity indicator, has 15 items for testing functional ability
Fugl-Meyer Assessment change from baseline at 4 weeks indicator of the level of impairment of upper extremity, with higher scores indicating lower impairment
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Fugl-Meyer Assessment baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline indicator of the level of impairment of upper extremity, with higher scores indicating lower impairment
Motor status score baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline evaluate the impairment level
Wolf motor function test baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline an activity indicator, has 15 items for testing functional ability
Mean velocity of upper extremity during reaching task baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline Mean velocity of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity during) reaching task
Motor activity log baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline Assesses the use of the paretic arm and hand during activities of daily living in hemiparetic stroke patients.
Action reach arm test baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline to assess upper extremity performance (coordination, dexterity and functioning) in stroke recovery
Box and block test baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline measures unilateral gross manual dexterity
Curvature of upper extremity during reaching task baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline Curvature of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity during) reaching task
Jerk of upper extremity during reaching task baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline Jerk of the magnetic sensor trajectory (Kinematics of upper extremity during) reaching task
Motor evoked potential over motor cortex of the affected side baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline Motor evoked potential elicited by noninvasive stimulation (rTMS) of the motor cortex
Stroke impact scale 3.0 baseline, 2 weeks after baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline Total score and individual domain score of stroke impact scale
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
National Rehabilitation Center
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of