Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT03584984
NCT03584984
Unknown
Not Applicable

Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Mandibular Molars Using Mixture of Autogenous Bone & Anorganic Bovine Bone (ABB) Versus Anorganic Bovine Bone Alone Versus Absorbent Gelatin Sponge

Cairo University0 sites30 target enrollmentAugust 1, 2018
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsBone ResorptionAlveolar Bone LossAlveolar Bone ResorptionBone Graft Failure

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Bone Resorption
Sponsor
Cairo University
Enrollment
30
Primary Endpoint
Histomorphometrical bone analysis
Last Updated
7 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

Alveolar bone atrophy post-extraction has been well documented in the past years. normal healing event results in a minimal loss of vertical height (around 1 mm), but a substantial loss of width in the buccal-lingual plane (4-6 mm). Alveolar socket preservation is thought to deal with this issue as to prevent the loss of alveolar bone dimensions post extraction in the case of delayed implant placement

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 1, 2018
End Date
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dina Mohammed Al-esawy

Principal Investigator

Cairo University

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Adult patients with hopeless mandibular molars indicated for extraction and implant placement in two stages that indicate socket preservation.
  • •Both sexes.
  • •No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.
  • •No systemic condition that contraindicate implant placement.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Presence of fenestrations or dehiscence of the residual bony Walls after extraction.
  • •Heavy smokers more than 20 cigarettes per day .(24)
  • •Patients with systemic disease that may affect normal healing.
  • •Psychiatric problems
  • •Disorders to implant are related to a history of radiation therapy to the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site.
  • •Patients that refuse to be called back for implant placement post extraction.
  • •Patients that have exceeded bone resorption surrounding the tooth prior to extraction and require guided bone regeneration.
  • •Pregnant Females.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Histomorphometrical bone analysis

Time Frame: 6 month post primary surgery

histological bone core analysis

Secondary Outcomes

  • Alveolar Bone marginal loss(6 month post primary surgery)

Similar Trials

Completed
Phase 4
Alveolar ridge preservation in post-extraction sockets using concentrated growth factors: A split-mouth, randomized, controlled clinical trial.CGF application, bone height and width, bone density, socket volume and periodontal pocket.Platelet, extraction, impacted teeth, alveolar ridge, regeneration, CGF.
TCTR20221028003Hospital of stomatology -Xian Jiaotong university30
Completed
Not Applicable
A Prospective Study: Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Tenting Screws, Acellular Dermal Matrix and Combination Particulate GraftsDental AlveolusOral Surgical Procedures, Preprosthetic
NCT01572298The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio34
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Alveolar Ridge Preservation in Molar Extraction Sockets With an Open Healed Collagen Membrane: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Tooth Extraction
NCT04802148National Taiwan University Hospital30
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Alveolar Ridge Preservation After Tooth ExtractionAlveolar Bone Loss
NCT06546826International Piezosurgery Academy60
Completed
Not Applicable
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autogenous Tooth Graft Versus Autogenous Demineralized Dentin Graft.Alveolar Ridge PreservationDentin GraftAutogenous Tooth Bone Graft
NCT03447795Cairo University20