Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06633211
NCT06633211
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

Clinical and Histological Effects of the Adjunctive Use of Polynucleotide and Hyaluronic Acid-based Gel in Alveolar Preservation After Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Adrià Jorba García1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentOctober 15, 2024

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Bone Substitutes
Sponsor
Adrià Jorba García
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Histomorphometric results
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

Alveolar ridge resorption after tooth extraction is a physiological process that continues throughout the patient's life due to the loss of the periodontal ligament and lack of mechanical stimulation. Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) techniques aim to minimize dimensional changes in the ridge after tooth extraction. These techniques involve grafting the socket to fill the bed and/or sealing it with a biomaterial. Currently, there is a polynucleotide and hyaluronic acid-based gel (Regenfast®) on the market that has proven useful in treating residual periodontal defects. Hyaluronic acid-based gels also appear to enhance the regenerative potential of critical bone defects in both in-vitro studies on rats and clinical studies. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the clinical and histological effects of polynucleotide and hyaluronic acid-based gel in alveolar preservation procedures.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 15, 2024
End Date
October 15, 2025
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Adrià Jorba García
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Adrià Jorba García

DDS, MS

University of Barcelona

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults (\>18 years) who need the extraction of a single non-molar tooth in the mandible or maxilla.
  • ASA I or II
  • Intact post-extraction socket or with only one wall dehiscence (buccal or lingual) of no more than 50% of the socket.
  • The treatment plan must include the replacement of the tooth to be extracted by placing an implant and an implant-supported prosthesis.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Mandibular incisors and molars.
  • Acute infection associated with the tooth that needs to be extracted.
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease.
  • Pregnant patient.
  • Patient under treatment with antiresorptives drugs (bisphosphonates or Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor Kappa-B Ligand (i.e., Denosumab)) or antiangiogenics.
  • Smokers (\>10 cigarettes a day).

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Histomorphometric results

Time Frame: 3 months

After 3 months of the ARP, A trephine with an internal diameter of 2.5 mm and a maximum length of 15 mm will be used to extract a bone core for histological analysis. Histological analyses will be performed on the entire sample area by calibrated and blinded examiners using open-source software (ImageJ, NIH). The areas of mineralized tissue and remaining xenograft material will be quantified based on their appearance and expressed as a percentage of the total area. The remaining area in the sample will be classified as non-mineralized tissue.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Visual evaluation of socket healing.(At 1 week and 12 weeks)
  • Implant insertion torque(3 months)
  • Need for additional bone regeneration for implant placement(3 months)
  • Dimensional changes(Measurement at the day of the ARP and 3 months)
  • Postoperative pain(During the first 7 postoperative days after ARP.)
  • Analgesic medication consumption(During the first 7 postoperative days after ARP.)
  • Oral health related quality of life(At the day of the ARP and 7 days postoperative)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials