MedPath

Etoricoxib vs Aceclofenac in the Treatment of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04144101
Lead Sponsor
Chung Shan Medical University
Brief Summary

Comparison of lower dosage etoricoxib (60 mg daily) with aceclofenac (100 mg bid) for their efficacy and safety in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

Detailed Description

This was a single medical center, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial, which conducted for eight weeks. In this study, 40 patients of RA were randomly assigned to two different treatment groups (etoricoxib and aceclofenac), and 20 patients were enrolled for each group. In addition to baseline data collection, objective assessment tools were used to evaluate for efficacy and safety. The primary endpoint was American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) , secondary endpoints were the ACR 50,70, disease activity score 28 (DAS 28), European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria, the number of tender and swollen joints, physician's global assessment, patient's global assessment, pain scores, the short form health survey (SF-36) health Questionnaire and etc. In addition, all adverse reactions were recorded and all the results were analyzed in the intention to treat (ITT) manner.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis as Rheumatoid Arthritis
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
    1. Pregnant or breast-feeding women. 2. Chemotherapy or radiation therapy in cancer patients
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
AceclofenacAceclofenacAceclofenac 100 mg BID
EtoricoxibEtoricoxibEtoricoxib 60 mg QD
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20)week 0, week 8

The investigators use ACR20 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
American College of Rheumatology 50% improvement criteria (ACR50)week 0, week 8

The investigators use ACR50 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0

American College of Rheumatology 70% improvement criteria (ACR70)week 0, week 8

The investigators use ACR70 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0

Disease activity score 28 (DAS28)week 0, week 8

The investigators use DAS28 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0

Physician's global assessment (PhGA)week 0, week 8

The investigators use PhGA to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0

Patient's global assessment (PGA)week 0, week 8

The investigators use PGA to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0

European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteriaweek 0, week 8

The investigators use EULAR responder rate to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0

The number of tender and swollen jointsweek 0, week 8

The investigators use the number of tender and swollen joints to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0

Visual Analog Scale for pain (VAS)week 0, week 8

The investigators use VAS to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0

Quality of life by SF-36week 0, week 8

The investigators use SF-36 to compared the difference between the week 8 and week 0

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath