NCT01088568
Unknown
Not Applicable
Randomized, Prospective Comparison of the Outcome of TICL and Q Value Customized LASIK for the Correction of Myopia With Astigmatism
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Myopia
- Sponsor
- Wenzhou Medical University
- Enrollment
- 30
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Comparing the efficacy, predictability, stability and safety of TICL versus Q-LASIK
- Last Updated
- 16 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The objective is to conduct a contralateral prospective clinical study to compare the safety, efficacy, and quality of vision of the STAAR Surgical Co. Toric Implantable Contact Lens TICL) versus Custom Laser Vision Correction (Q-LASIK) in human eyes for the correction of myopia with astigmatism.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age: 21-45 years old
- •Documented stable refraction for at least 1 year
- •(-3.0 to -8.0D of myopia with -1.0 to -4.0D of astigmatism or SE from -3.5 to -10D
- •BSCVA: 20/20 or better
- •Pupil diameter: smaller than 7mm under mesopic condition
- •Contact lens discontinued 3 weeks and 1 week for hard and soft wearers respectively
Exclusion Criteria
- •Evidence of progressive or acute disease
- •Evidence of connective tissue disease or clinically significant atopic disease
- •ACD less than 2.8mm from endothelium
- •ECC less than 2200 cells/mm2
- •Narrow angle of anterior chamber
- •Residual stromal thickness less than 280 microns
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Comparing the efficacy, predictability, stability and safety of TICL versus Q-LASIK
Time Frame: 1week, 1,3,6 months
Secondary Outcomes
- Comparing wavefront aberrometry of TICL vs Q-LASIK Comparing contrast sensitivity of TICL vs Q-LASIK Comparing patient satisfaction of TICL vs Q-LASIK(1, 3, 6 months)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison Between Epidural and Bilateral Paravertebral Blocks in Liver ResectionLiver DiseasePainNCT01407666University of Pittsburgh100
Not yet recruiting
Phase 3
Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Rosuvastatin Vs CoQ10 on Nonalcoholic SteatohepatitisNonalcoholic SteatohepatitisNCT05731596Tanta University46
Completed
Not Applicable
Directly Observed Therapy Short Course-Plus Versus DOTS for Retreatment of Relapsed Pulmonary Tuberculosis in GuangzhouPulmonary TuberculosisNCT01618422Chinese University of Hong Kong225
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of Two Universal Composites in Posterior TeethDental CariesNCT02888873Hacettepe University40
Unknown
Not Applicable
Midurethral Synthetic Tape With Tension Control Mechanism Versus Midurethral Free TapeUrinary Stress IncontinenceNCT04101279Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry120