Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03630484
NCT03630484
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison Between Ventilator Hyperinflation and Manual Rib Cage Compression: Randomized Crossover Trial

Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa0 sites30 target enrollmentNovember 28, 2014

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Pulmonary Atelectasis
Sponsor
Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa
Enrollment
30
Primary Endpoint
Static compliance of respiratory system
Status
Completed
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This is a randomized crossover trial to evaluate the effects of thoracic compression applied alone or in association with hyperinflation maneuver with the ventilator. In addition, the mobilized volume and peak expiratory flow resulting from both maneuvers will be evaluated.

Detailed Description

Ventilator hyperinflation is widely used in hypersecretive patients. It consists of increasing alveolar ventilation by facilitating the coughing mechanism so that the secretions of the peripheral airways are mobilized into the central airways so that they can be removed by tracheal aspiration or cough. Thoracic compression consists of manually compressing the rib cage during expiration, in order to increase expiratory flow, mobilize and remove pulmonary secretions. A randomized crossover clinical trial was performed with 30 patients submitted to isolated compression or associated with ventilator hyperinflation, with a 6 hour interval. Patients were evaluated through compliance and resistance of the respiratory system.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
November 28, 2014
End Date
July 11, 2017
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Luciano Matos Chicayban

Principal Investigator

Brazilian Institute of Higher Education of Censa

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patients under mechanical ventilation
  • diagnosis of pulmonary infection
  • hypersecretive

Exclusion Criteria

  • haemodynamic instability (heart rate \> 130 bpm and mean arterial pressure \< 60 mmHg)
  • acute bronchospasm
  • acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • untreated pneumothorax

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Static compliance of respiratory system

Time Frame: Baseline (before), immediately after ventilator hyperinflation or rib cage compression and five minutes after aspiration

Compliance was assessed through the occlusion maneuver at the end of inspiration, considering tidal volume, plateau pressure and PEEP. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.

Total Resistance of respiratory system

Time Frame: Baseline (before), immediately after ventilator hyperinflation or rib cage compression and five minutes after aspiration

The total resistance of the respiratory system was evaluated through the occlusion maneuver at the end of the inspiration, considering the resistive pressure, measured by the difference between the maximum plateau pressure. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.

Airway Resistance

Time Frame: Baseline (before), immediately after ventilator hyperinflation or rib cage compression and five minutes after aspiration

The airway resistance was assessed by means of the occlusion maneuver at the end of the inspiration, considering the rapid fall of the pressure immediately after the occlusion, measured by the difference between the maximum pressure and P1. Three measurements were taken at each moment, the mean being used.

Peak expiratory flow

Time Frame: Baseline (before), immediately after ventilator hyperinflation or rib cage compression and five minutes after aspiration

The peak expiratory flow was evaluated through passive expiration, being considered the greatest value of the flow in the expiratory phase.

Similar Trials