跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01741714
NCT01741714已完成不适用

Is Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy an Efficient Treatment Option for Migraine? A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

University Hospital, Akershus2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 104 人开始时间: 2013年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
104
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number og headache days

研究概览

简要总结

This study will highlight and validate chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT) for migraine. If the method proves to be effective, it will provide a new non-pharmacological treatment option for migraine. This is especially important since some migraineurs do not tolerate acute and/or prophylactic medicine, due to side effects or contraindications due to comorbidity of other diseases while others do not have effect. Thus, alternative treatment options are warranted. The applied methodology of the study will aim towards the highest possible research standards. This international study is a collaboration between Akershus University Hospital, University of Oslo (UiO), Norway and Macquarie University, Australia. The multidisciplinary professional backgrounds are physiotherapy, chiropractic and medicine. By increasing the methodological quality of the investigators research to a very high level, the investigators see the method to work as a guide to increase the quality of chiropractic research in the future, as previous randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of migraine used methodology showing room for improvement.

详细描述

Migraine is characterized by a unilateral pulsating moderate/severe headache which is aggravated by routine physical activity, and is accompanied by photo- and/or phonophobia, nausea and sometimes vomiting. Migraine exists in two forms, migraine without aura (MO) and migraine with aura (MA). Aura is reversible neurological disturbances of the vision, sensory and/or speech, which occur prior to the headache. The aura symptoms show intra-individual variations. The origin of migraine pain is still debated, since the origin of painful impulses in the trigeminal nerve is still uncertain. Some argues for central and other argues for peripheral mechanisms. Extracranial pain sensitive structures include skin, muscles, arteries, periosteum and joints. The skin is sensitive to all usual forms of pain stimuli, while especially temporal and neck muscles may be sources for pain and tenderness in migraine. Similarly is the frontal supraorbital, superficial temporal, posterior and occipital arteries sensitive to pain. It has been hypothesize that CSMT might relieve migraine due to stimulation of different mechanoreceptors in the neck such as the zygapophyseal joints, intervertebral discs and neck muscles. Numerous studies of manipulations have been conducted, but all had one or more methodological shortcomings, i.e. failure to specify diagnostic criteria, inadequate or no randomization procedure, lack of control, lack of patient blinding, lack of specified primary and secondary end points and shortcomings of statistical evaluation of the results. A few RCTs suggest that CSMT using diversified technique is an effective therapy for migraine. The diversified technique is used by 91% of chiropractors, and include a collections of procedures, hence the name diversified. It focuses on inter-segmental pretension (soft tissue tension) prior to the delivery of high velocity low amplitude (HVLA) adjustment. The Gonstead method is used by 59% of chiropractors and is also based on HVLA, but a major difference is the minimal usage of rotation in all adjustments in contrast to the diversified technique. The Gonstead method is considered safe, since severe adverse reactions have not been encountered. No studies have previously investigated the efficacy of the Gonstead method for migraine, although research in other CSMT modalities has been recommended.

Study hypothesis CSMT using the Gonstead method reduces days with migraine by at least 25% as compared to placebo (sham manipulation, i.e. broad non-specific contact, non-directional, low velocity and low amplitude) and no intervention (control group).

The RCT is single blinded, placebo-controlled trial of CSMT using the Gonstead method vs. sham manipulation and control group. If the treatment shows to be effective, the participants whom receive sham manipulation or control will be offered true intervention after the follow-up period and free of charge. This study will follow the recommendations set by the clinical trial guidelines from the IHS, while the methodological quality control will in general follow previous suggested criteria and the CONSORT statements.

Patients will be recruited through Akershus University Hospital, Norway as well as through media advertising in Akershus and Oslo County. The diagnoses are set by a chiropractor and a neurologist with experience in headache. In accordance with good clinical practice, all patients will receive written and oral information about the project and will be informed about the harms and benefits as well as adverse reaction of the intervention. A total of 90 participants need to be recruited to the clinical trial.

The clinical trials consist of three stages: Run-in, intervention (treatment) and follow-up.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Migraine according to the diagnostic criteria of the ICHD-II (8)
  • At least one migraine attack per month
  • Age 18-70 years

排除标准

  • Contraindication to spinal manipulation
  • Chiropractic treatment within the last 12 months
  • Radiculopathy
  • Depression
  • Pregnancy
  • Participants whom become pregnant during the migraine trial will also be excluded from analysis from the time of pregnancy
  • Participants who change their prophylactic medical regime for headaches will be excluded in the analysis from the time of change

研究组 & 干预措施

Chiropractic Spinal Manipulative Therapy

Active Comparator

Active chiropractic spinal manipulative treatment

干预措施: Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (Other)

Sham manipulation

Sham Comparator

Sham chiropractic manipulative therapy

干预措施: Sham chiropractic manipulative therapy (Other)

Control group

No Intervention

No intervention, follow headache diary

结局指标

主要结局

Number og headache days

时间窗: Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up

1. 25% reduction in number of headache days between active treatment and sham. 2. 25% reduction in number of headache days between active treatment and control group.

次要结局

  • Headache duration(Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up)
  • Headache medication(Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up)
  • Self reported VAS(Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up)
  • Headache index(Change from baseline to post-treatment, 3, 6, 12 months follow-up)

研究者

发起方
University Hospital, Akershus
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Aleksander Chaibi

PhD student

University Hospital, Akershus

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验