Progression of Renal Interstitial Fibrosis / Tubular Atrophy (IF/TA) According to Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) and Immunosuppressive Regimen (Everolimus Based Versus CNI Based) in de Novo Renal Transplant Recipients

Phase 3

Completed

Conditions: Renal Interstitial Fibrosis

Interventions: Drug: Certican®
Drug: Neoral
Drug: Myfortic
Drug: Simulect®
Drug: Corticosteroids

Registration Number: NCT01079143

Lead Sponsor: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Brief Summary: Recently, early biomarkers of renal interstitial fibrosis have been identified, amongst them de novo expression of vimentin by tubular epithelial cells, which is an intermediate filament, and the translocation of beta-catenin into their cytoplasm. These markers, when present, suggest that the epithelial cell undergoes a phenomenon well known as "epithelial to mesenchymal transition" (EMT) and could behaves like a myo-fibroblast. EMT is highly instrumental in several models of tissue fibrosis, including in the kidney. Actually, it has not only been demonstrated that these markers are detectable in the renal graft at an early time point post-transplant (i.e. as soon as three months), but also that the intensity of their expression correlates with the progression of interstitial fibrosis of the graft between 3 and 12 months

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 194

Inclusion Criteria

Recipient of a primary or secondary deceased or living (related or not) donor kidney transplant and who requires basiliximab induction therapy.
Cold ischemia time < 30 hours.
Women of child-bearing age, even those with a history of infertility, must have had a negative pregnancy test during the 7 days before screening or at the time of screening, and must use a recognized and reliable method of contraception throughout the study and for 2 months after discontinuing the study treatment.
Patients who want and are able to take part in the entire study, and have given their written consent.
Patients who are registered with a French national health insurance scheme or are covered by such a scheme.

Exclusion Criteria

Recipient of multi-organ transplantation, including dual kidneys, or who have previously received non renal transplant organ.
Patients receiving a graft from a non-heart-beating donor.
Anti-HLA antibody levels ≥ 20% in the last 3 months before the inclusion.
ABO incompatible graft or with positive cross match T.
Severe hyperlipidemia: total cholesterol ≥ 9.1 mmol/L (≥ 350 mg/dL) and/or triglycerides ≥ 8.5 mmol/L (≥ 750 mg/dL) despite appropriate lipid-lowering therapy.
Known hypersensitivity or contraindications to mycophenolic acid, cyclosporine or lactose.
Known hypersensitivity or contraindications to macrolides or drugs of the mTOR inhibitor class.
HIV seropositive, or active chronic hepatitis B (HBs Ab) or C. Results obtained during the 6 months before the inclusion are accepted. Recipients from donors with hepatitis B or C will be excluded.
Patients with thrombocytopenia (≤ 75000/mm3), absolute neutrophil count (≤ 1500/mm3), leukocytopenia (≤ 2500/mm3) and/or hemoglobin < 8g/dL at the inclusion visit.
ASAT, ALAT or total bilirubin ≥ 3 UNL.
Uncontrolled severe infection, severe allergy requiring an acute or chronic treatment.
Patients with a malignant disease or previous malignancy in the past 5 years, with the exception of excised basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma and in situ cervical cancer treated.
Medical or surgical condition, with the exception of the transplantation, which in the investigator's opinion could exclude the patient.
Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding or of reproductive age and refuse or are unable to use a recognized and reliable method of contraception.
Patients with symptoms of significant mental or somatic disease. Inability to cooperate or communicate with the investigator.
Patients under supervision or guardianship or any patient subject to legal protection

Randomization criteria:

Eligibility criteria (no later than 4 months post-transplantation:

Renal graft biopsy performed at M3 and adequate histological material sent within the deadline for the determination of EMT.
Woman of child-bearing potential, even in case of a history of infertility, must use a recognized and reliable method of contraception throughout the study and for 2 months after discontinuing the study treatment.

Non-eligibility criteria (no later than 4 months post-transplantation):

Acute rejection histologically proven between transplantation and randomization (local reading).
Acute subclinical rejection diagnosed on the M3 biopsy (except borderline lesions) (local reading).
Positive anti-donor antibodies at M3.
Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (MDRDa).
Proteinuria ≥ 1 g/24h.
Severe hyperlipidemia: total cholesterol ≥ 9.1 mmol/L (≥ 350 mg/dL) and/or triglycerides ≥ 8.5 mmol/L (≥ 750 mg/dL) despite appropriate lipid-lowering therapy.
Thrombocytopenia (≤ 75000/mm3), absolute neutrophil count (≤ 1500/mm3), leukocytopenia (≤ 2500/mm3) and/or hemoglobin < 8 g/dL.
ASAT, ALAT or total bilirubin ≥ 3 UNL.
Medical or surgical condition which in the investigator's opinion might exclude the patient.

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Certican EMT+	Certican®	Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®.
Certican EMT+	Simulect®	Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®.
Certican EMT+	Corticosteroids	Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®.
Certican EMT-	Certican®	Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®.
Certican EMT-	Corticosteroids	Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®.
Neoral EMT+	Neoral	Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
Certican EMT-	Simulect®	Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®.
Neoral EMT+	Simulect®	Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
Neoral EMT+	Corticosteroids	Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
Neoral EMT-	Neoral	Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
Neoral EMT-	Corticosteroids	Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
Neoral EMT-	Simulect®	Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
Certican EMT+	Myfortic	Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®.
Certican EMT-	Myfortic	Patients randomized to the Certican® treatment group started this treatment after randomization (which took place 3 to 4 months post-transplantation), preferably in the evening, otherwise the following morning. Patients in the Neoral® treatment group did not receive Certican®.
Neoral EMT+	Myfortic	Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.
Neoral EMT-	Myfortic	Between transplantation and randomization, all patients have received Neoral®. Treatment had to be initiated within 24 hours post-transplantation in combination with Myfortic®.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Graft Fibrosis (Primary Comparison - ITT Population	Month 3 (M3) and Month 12 (M12) post transplantation	Progression of Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) is the percentage (%) of participants with an increase \>= 1 in IF/TA grade according to Banff (2005 - 2007)according to Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and by treatment groups. Grade I (the better): mild interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (\<25% of cortical area) Grade II : moderate interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (26-50% of cortical area) Grade III (the worse) : severe interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (\>50% of cortical area)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA)	M3 and M12 post transplantation	Incidence and severity of IF/TA according to 2005/2007 Banff classification system grades (grades l to lll). IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (\<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (\>50% of lesions).
Change in Interstitial Fibrosis/Tabular Atrophy (IF/TA) Grade	M3 and M12 post transplantation	Difference (M12 - M3) in IF/TA grade. IF/TA grade was assessed during centralized reading according to the Banff 2005/2007 classification comprising grade I (\<25%), grade II (25-50%) and grade III (\>50% of lesions).
Risk Factors of IF/TA Progression	M12 post transplantation	Composite factors regarding fibrosis progression at 12 months using a logistic regression model; the parameters initially considered concerned the demographic characteristics of both recipient and donor, transplantation characteristics, hypertension, diabetes, study treatments, immunosuppression, EMT, IF/TA, function at M3, the onset of acute rejection, the presence of anti-donor antibodies at M12, infections and BK virus viremia. Arteriolar hyaline thickening is thickening of the walls of arterioles by the deposition of homogeneous pink hyaline material. BPAR is biopsy proven acute rejection. TEM progression is the increase ≥ 1 of TEM score between Month 3 and Month 12
Change in Percentage of Interstitial Fibrosis (IF) by Numerical Quantification	M3 and M12 post transplantation	Percentage of IF measured by numerical quantification. The IF percentage was transposed in grade according to the following rule: grade 0 for an IF % ≤5%, grade I for an IF % ranging from \>5% to \< 25%, grade II for an IF % ranging from 25 to 50%, grade III for an IF % \>50%. Interstitial graft fibrosis has been identified as the primary cause of graft loss following death with a functional graft \[3-5\].
Incidence (Number) of Subclinical Rejections and Borderline Lesions	M3	Incidence of subclinical rejections and borderline lesions with regards to histological evidence of rejection with clinical findings. Subclinical rejections: rejection without clinical symptoms which is diagnosed by chance when a graft biopsy is performed. Clinically suspected BPAR: rejection suspected because of the presence of clinical symptoms (fever, pain, increase of creatinine) and then confirmed by the graft biopsy. Borderline lesions: suspicious for acute T-cell mediated rejection. This category is used when no intimal arteritis is present, but there are foci of tubulitis with minor interstitial infiltration or interstitial infiltration with mild tubulitis.
Change From Baseline (M3) in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)	M3 (baseline) to M12 post transplantation	eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²). LOCF = Last observation carried forward
Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at M12 From Baseline (M3) - ANCOVA Model	Baseline (M3), M12	The average patient renal function was evaluated on the basis of eGFR was calculated according to the abbreviated MDRD formula and creatinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula (mL/min/1.73m²).
Change in Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio (Without Imputation)	Month 3 (baseline), Month 12	One of the factors associated with EMT progression between M3 and M12 according to univariate analysis (ITT biopsies M3 \& M12).
Treatment Failures	M6 and M12 post transplantation	A treatment failure is defined as biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), a graft loss, a death or a loss to follow up. It was assessed between randomization and 6 and 12 months post-transplantation.
Type of Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection (BPAR)	M6 and M12 post transplantation	A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (\> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (\> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising \> 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation).
Severity of BPAR	M6 and M12 post transplantation	A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system. Biopsy graded IA: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of moderate tubulitis (\> 4 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IB: Significant interstitial infiltration (\> 25% of parenchyma) and foci of severe tubulitis (\> 10 mononuclear cells/tubular cross section or group of 10 tubular cells). Biopsy grade IIA: Mild to moderate intimal arteritis. Biopsy graded IIB: Severe intimal arteritis comprising \> 25% of the lumenal area. Biopsy graded III: Transmural (full vessel wall thickness) arteritis and/or arterial fibrinoid change and necrosis of medial smooth muscle cells (with accompanying lymphocytic inflammation).
Number of Participants With Progression of Renal Fibrosis Using Numerical Quantification	M3 to M12 post transplantation	Comparisons according to epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) profile and immunosuppressive treatment
Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Status	M3 and M12 post transplantation	Incidence and severity of EMT status. EMT status was determined centrally using the graft biopsy taken at 3 months. The result was quickly obtained (within 7 to 15 days) and sent to the company in charge of randomization in order to allocate each patient to a treatment group and to provide the investigator with this information without confirming EMT status.
Number of Participants With Epithelial-mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Score	M3 and M12 post transplantation	Incidence and severity of EMT score. The intensity of EMT markers expression present and detectable in the renal graft at an early stage following transplantation is known as EMT score. EMT score 0 (the best): \<1 EMT score 1 (the better): 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2: 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3: 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): \>50% of tubular atrophy
Change in EMT Score	M3 and M12 post transplantation	Change (M12 - M3) in EMT Score. Progression in EMT score is defined as an increase by \>=1 of EMT score from M3 to M12. EMT score 0 (the best): \<1 EMT score 1 (the better) : 1-10% of tubular atrophy EMT score 2 : 10-25% of tubular atrophy EMT score 3 : 25-50% of tubular atrophy EMT score 4 (the worst): \>50% of tubular atrophy
Incidence (Number) of BPAR	M6 and M12 post transplantation	A biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR) is defined as a biopsy graded IA, IB, IIA, IIB or III as per 2005/2007 Banff histological classification system.
Incidence (Number) of Participants With Graft Losses	M6 and M12 post transplantation	If a participant underwent a graft nephrectomy, then the day of nephrectomy was considered as the day of graft loss.