MedPath

A Trial of Linaclotide 290 μg in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Constipation (IBS-C)

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Characterized by Constipation
Interventions
Drug: Placebo
Registration Number
NCT03573908
Lead Sponsor
Ironwood Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Brief Summary

To evaluate the efficacy on abdominal symptoms (abdominal bloating, abdominal discomfort, and abdominal pain) and safety of linaclotide 290 μg administered orally to patients with IBS-C.

Detailed Description

This study consists of a 12-week Treatment Period followed by 4-week Randomized Withdrawal (RW) Period.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
614
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient has no clinically significant findings on a physical examination and clinical laboratory tests

  • Female patients of childbearing potential must agree to use one of the following methods of birth control:

    1. Hormonal contraception
    2. Double-barrier birth control
    3. Maintenance of a monogamous relationship with a male partner who has been surgically sterilized by vasectomy
  • Patient meets protocol criteria for diagnosis of IBS-C

  • Patient demonstrates continued IBS-C symptoms through Pretreatment Period

  • Patient maintains a minimum level of compliance with daily diary

Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient has history of loose or watery stools
  • Patient has symptoms of or been diagnosed with a medical condition that may contribute to abdominal pain
  • Patient has a structural abnormality of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract or a disease or condition that can affect GI motility
  • Patient has any protocol-excluded or clinically significant medical or surgical history that could confound the study assessments

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Linaclotide 290 µgPlaceboParticipants receive linaclotide 290 µg orally once daily for 12 weeks during the Treatment Period. At Week 12 participants are rerandomized to receive either linaclotide 290 µg or placebo for 4 weeks in the Randomized Withdrawal Period.
PlaceboPlaceboParticipants receive placebo to linaclotide orally once daily for 12 weeks during the Treatment Period. At Week 12 participants are switched to receive linaclotide 290 µg for 4 weeks during the Randomized Withdrawal Period.
Linaclotide 290 µgLinaclotideParticipants receive linaclotide 290 µg orally once daily for 12 weeks during the Treatment Period. At Week 12 participants are rerandomized to receive either linaclotide 290 µg or placebo for 4 weeks in the Randomized Withdrawal Period.
PlaceboLinaclotideParticipants receive placebo to linaclotide orally once daily for 12 weeks during the Treatment Period. At Week 12 participants are switched to receive linaclotide 290 µg for 4 weeks during the Randomized Withdrawal Period.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall Change From Baseline in Abdominal Score (Abdominal Bloating, Abdominal Discomfort, and Abdominal Pain) Throughout the Treatment PeriodBaseline (14 days before randomization up to the time of randomization), Treatment Period (Weeks 1-12)

A participant's daily abdominal score was calculated as the average of daily e-diary abdominal pain, abdominal bloating and abdominal discomfort scores, each based on an 11-point scale of 0 (none) and 10 (worst possible). Baseline abdominal score was derived from the eDiary data collected daily in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization up to the time of randomization. The participant's abdominal score was averaged on a weekly basis, and each weekly change from baseline was calculated for the treatment period and used as the dependent variable in the mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) model. MMRM results are based on a model with treatment, analysis week, region and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. An unstructured covariance structure was used to model intra-subject correlation with subjects as a random effect.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall Change From Baseline in Abdominal Score (Abdominal Bloating, Abdominal Discomfort, and Abdominal Pain) Over Time in the Treatment PeriodBaseline (14 days before randomization up to the time of randomization), Weeks 1-12

A participant's daily abdominal score was calculated as the average of daily e-diary abdominal pain, abdominal bloating and abdominal discomfort scores, each based on an 11-point scale of 0 (none) and 10 (worst possible). Baseline abdominal score was derived from the eDiary data collected daily in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization up to the time of randomization. The participant's abdominal score was averaged on a weekly basis, and each weekly change from baseline was calculated for the treatment period and used as the dependent variable in the mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) model. MMRM results are based on a model with treatment, analysis week, region and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. An unstructured covariance structure was used to model intra-subject correlation with subjects as a random effect.

Cumulative Distribution of Change From Baseline in 12-Week Abdominal ScoreBaseline (14 days before randomization up to the time of randomization), Treatment Period (Weeks 1-12)

A participant's daily abdominal score was calculated as the average of daily e-diary abdominal pain, abdominal bloating and abdominal discomfort scores, each based on an 11-point scale of 0 (none) and 10 (worst possible). Baseline abdominal score was derived from the eDiary data collected daily in the Pretreatment Period, specifically the period of time from 14 days before randomization up to the time of randomization. The 12-week abdominal score was the average of the non-missing abdominal scores reported over the course of the treatment period. Change from baseline (BL) was calculated as the 12-week score minus the baseline score. The table presents the percentage of participants whose 12-week change from baseline was less than or equal to the threshold value of the score change (cumulative distribution of change).

Percentage of 6/12 Week Abdominal Score Responders (Responder Rate)Baseline (14 days before randomization up to the time of randomization), Treatment Period (Weeks 1-12)

A 6/12 week abdominal score responder is a participant who meets the weekly abdominal score responder criteria for at least 6 out of the 12 weeks of the Treatment Period. For each week in the Treatment Period, a weekly abdominal score responder is a participant who has an improvement from baseline of at least 2 points (ie, a -2 point change from baseline) in the respective weekly abdominal score. If a participant did not have at least 4 completed eDiary entries for a particular Treatment Period week, the participant was not considered a responder for that week.

A participant's daily abdominal score was calculated as the average of daily e-diary abdominal pain, abdominal bloating and abdominal discomfort scores, each based on an 11-point scale of 0 (none) and 10 (worst possible). The participant's abdominal score was averaged on a weekly basis, and each weekly change from baseline was calculated for the treatment period.

Trial Locations

Locations (77)

Clinical Research Associates

🇺🇸

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Elite Clinical Studies

🇺🇸

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Adobe Clinical Research, LLC

🇺🇸

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Arkansas Gastroenterology

🇺🇸

North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

GW Research, Inc.

🇺🇸

Chula Vista, California, United States

Kindred Medical Institute for Clinical Trials, LLC

🇺🇸

Corona, California, United States

Diagnamics, Inc.

🇺🇸

Encinitas, California, United States

MD Studies, Inc.

🇺🇸

Fountain Valley, California, United States

Paragon Rx Clinical, Inc. - Garden Grove

🇺🇸

Garden Grove, California, United States

Grossmont Center For Clinical Research

🇺🇸

La Mesa, California, United States

Scroll for more (67 remaining)
Clinical Research Associates
🇺🇸Huntsville, Alabama, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.