Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06419894
NCT06419894
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

Advanced Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease: ADVOCATE-CMR

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc0 sites182 target enrollmentDecember 1, 2024

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Enrollment
182
Primary Endpoint
Diagnostic accuracy of QP CMR (stress myocardial blood flow [MBF], stress relative MBF [rMBF], myocardial perfusion reserve [MPR] and relative MPR [rMPR]) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR
Status
Not yet recruiting
Last Updated
last year

Overview

Brief Summary

Stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is an established non-invasive imaging test for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Fully automated quantitative perfusion CMR (QP CMR) is a new technical advancement, which offers measurement of myocardial blood flow in CMR. Additionally, recent innovations have introduced various contrast-agent-free methods for CAD assessment, such as stress T1 mapping reactivity (∆T1) and oxygen-sensitive CMR (OS CMR). These methods might eliminate the necessity for contrast administration in clinical practice, simplifying, reducing time, invasiveness and costs in evaluating patients with suspected obstructive CAD. The ADVOCATE-CMR study aims to validate QP CMR, ∆T1 and OS CMR imaging against invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) for detection of obstructive CAD. The study also aims to head-to-head compare the diagnostic accuracy of these CMR techniques with the conventional visual assessment of stress perfusion CMR and to correlate them to short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

Detailed Description

Study design: Single-center, observational, prospective, cross-sectional cohort study performed at the Amsterdam University Medical Centers - Location VUmc. Study population: 182 symptomatic patients with suspected obstructive CAD (without a previous CAD history), scheduled for invasive coronary angiography (ICA) according to the decision of the treating clinician. Methods: 1. CMR image acquisition prior to clinically scheduled ICA, using the following pulse sequences: cine imaging, OS-CMR with breathing maneuvers, adenosine-stress and rest T1 mapping, adenosine-stress and rest QP-CMR, late gadolinium enhancement; 2. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), ratio between proximal and distal coronary pressures over entire resting cycle period (Pd/Pa ratio), coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcircular resistance (IMR) in all main coronary arteries during ICA; 3. Follow-up CMR according to the abovementioned protocol 3 months after ICA (or 3 months after revascularization, if performed separately more than 1 day following ICA); 4. Clinical follow-up - 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after ICA or revascularization (if performed separately more than 1 day following ICA)

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 1, 2024
End Date
June 1, 2033
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Sonia Borodzicz-Jazdzyk

Project Leader

Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Diagnostic accuracy of QP CMR (stress myocardial blood flow [MBF], stress relative MBF [rMBF], myocardial perfusion reserve [MPR] and relative MPR [rMPR]) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR

Time Frame: ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan

Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Diagnostic accuracy of ΔT1 to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR(ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan)
  • Relation of stress and rest MBF and rMBF, MPR and rMPR, ΔT1 and B-MORE to SAQ-7 Quality of Life score(Before ICA and 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after the ICA (or revascularization if applicable))
  • Relation of stress and rest MBF and rMBF, MPR and rMPR, ΔT1 and B-MORE to Rose Dyspnea Scale score(Before ICA and 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after the ICA (or revascularization if applicable))
  • Head-to-head comparison of diagnostic accuracies of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR, rMPR), ΔT1, OS CMR (B-MORE) and conventional visual assessment of GBCA-based first pass perfusion imaging to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR(ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan)
  • Diagnostic accuracy of OS CMR (B-MORE) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by iFR and resting Pd/Pa(ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan)
  • Relation of stress and rest MBF and rMBF, MPR and rMPR, ΔT1 and B-MORE to SAQ-7 Angina Frequency score(Before ICA and 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after the ICA (or revascularization if applicable))
  • Prognostic value of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR and rMPR), stress T1 mapping reactivity and OS CMR (B-MORE)(3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 3 years)
  • Diagnostic accuracy of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR and rMPR) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by iFR and resting Pd/Pa(ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan)
  • Diagnostic accuracy of ΔT1 to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by iFR and resting Pd/Pa(ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan)
  • Relation of stress and rest MBF and rMBF, MPR and rMPR, ΔT1 and B-MORE to Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ)-7 Summary score(Before ICA and 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after the ICA (or revascularization if applicable))
  • Diagnostic accuracy of OS CMR (breathing-induced myocardial oxygenation reserve; B-MORE) to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by FFR(ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan)
  • Head-to-head comparison of diagnostic accuracies of QP CMR (stress MBF, stress rMBF, MPR, rMPR), ΔT1, OS CMR (B-MORE) and conventional visual assessment of first pass perfusion imaging to detect obstructive CAD, as defined by iFR and resting Pd/Pa(ICA + hemodynamic measurements within 6 weeks of the initial CMR scan)
  • Relation of stress and rest MBF and rMBF, MPR and rMPR, ΔT1 and B-MORE to SAQ-7 Physical Limitation score(Before ICA and 3, 6 months, 1 and 3 years after the ICA (or revascularization if applicable))

Similar Trials