Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00665379
NCT00665379
Completed
Not Applicable

Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effect of 3M Coban 2 Layer Compression System Versus Trico Bandages in the Treatment of Leg Lymphedema.

Nij Smellinghe Hosptial1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentApril 2008
ConditionsLeg Lymphedema

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Leg Lymphedema
Sponsor
Nij Smellinghe Hosptial
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
volume decrease in relation to interface pressure after application of two types of bandages.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
13 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this trial is to study the effect of the 3M Coban 2 Layer Compression System (hereafter C2L) in the treatment of leg lymphedema compared to the traditional treatment with Trico bandages.

Detailed Description

The goal of this prospective, randomized, controlled trial with CE marked product is to study the effectiveness (volume reduction) of 24-hour compression therapy for lymphedema, comparing C2L and Trico bandaging. Therefore 30 patients with leg lymphedema are included. Application of marketed compression bandages (C2L or Trico bandages) used for treatment by trained specialists with assessment of the subbandage pressure and volume reduction. Measurements are carried out at: Volumetry: Measurements after 0h, 2h and 24 h by using classic water displacement apparatus. Pressure: Measurements after 0h, 2h (pre and post bandage change) and 24 h; * supine and standing to calculate the SSI; * supine with and without dorsal flexion. for the pressure measurement a Kikuhime (large pads) dice is used. At each new bandaging to document the SSI and the effect of dorsiflexion in the supine position * The subbandage pressure is measured on the medial aspect of the lower leg at the transition of the gastrocnemius muscle into the Achilles' tendon (B1) (Partsch H. et al. Dermatol Surg 2006; 32: 224-233). * Fix the sensor (sensor and tube sheathed with Cellona Soft Padding) Statistical analysis; Analysis of variance (ANOVA) comparing volume, supine subbandage pressure with and without dorsiflexion, and SSI for the used bandages

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2008
End Date
May 2009
Last Updated
13 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Nij Smellinghe Hosptial
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

R.J. Damstra

MD PhD

Nij Smellinghe Hosptial

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Gender: male or female
  • More than 18 years of age
  • Patients with distal lymphedema of the leg requiring multilayer lymphedema bandaging of the leg
  • The patient is able to understand the study and is willing to give written informed consent to the study

Exclusion Criteria

  • Allergy against one of the used materials
  • Proximal lymphedema (involvement of thigh, genitalia)
  • Severe systemic diseases causing peripheral oedema
  • Acute superficial or deep vein thrombosis
  • Arterial occlusive disease (stadium II, III or IV) or arm/leg blood pressure index (ALPI)\<0,8
  • Local infection in the therapy area
  • Auto-immunological disorders or vasculitis
  • Use of systemic corticosteroids

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

volume decrease in relation to interface pressure after application of two types of bandages.

Time Frame: enrollment of 30 patients

Secondary Outcomes

  • Pressure drop after 2 hours and 24 hours of bandaging(after application, at 2 hours and 24 hours after application of bandage)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials