MedPath

A Comparison of Custom-manufactured vs. Off-the-rack (OTR) Compression Hosiery for Initial Management of Venous Disease

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Venous Disease
Registration Number
NCT03630185
Lead Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Brief Summary

The purpose of this research study is to assess the efficacy of custom-manufactured compression hosiery (also known as compression stockings) compared to similar off-the-rack (OTR) compression stockings.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
8
Inclusion Criteria
  • Ability to comprehend and sign an informed consent and complete study questionnaires
  • Patient is participating in usual work and home activities with no changes anticipated for the duration of the study
  • The use of compression stocking is prescribed in accordance with the usual practice and management of venous disorders
  • The patient will confirm they are willing to pay for the compression stockings.
Exclusion Criteria
  • The patient has a known allergy to any component of the stocking (latex, etc)
  • The patient has non-venous source of pain in either leg that could, in the opinion of the investigator, confound the results of the study i.e.Neuropathy, Arterial insufficiency, Diabetes
  • The patient is confined to bed
  • The patient has uncontrolled Congestive Heart Failure
  • The patient has acute dermatitis
  • The patient has weeping dermatosis
  • Patients with venous ulcers will be excluded.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mental/Emotional Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument Mental Component Summary (MCS)6 months

The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health.

The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.

Pain Management Experienced During Their Postoperative Care as Assessed by Five-point Satisfaction Scale6 months

Five-point satisfaction scale consists of patients rating their overall postoperative pain management experience using a 5-point rating system. The scale ranges from 1 to 5, with 1 being "extremely dissatisfied", 2 "somewhat dissatisfied", 3 "Neutral/Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied", 4 "somewhat satisfied" and 5 "extremely satisfied" with their postoperative pain care.

Pain as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory6 months

The Brief Pain Inventory is a medical questionnaire used to measure pain, developed by the Pain Research Group of the World Health Organization Collaborating Center for Symptom Evaluation in Cancer Care.

The score is an average of seven questions about pain interference in life. The score scale is from 0 to 10. 0 being pain does not interfere and 10 being that it completely interferes. 10 would be a worst outcome.

Overall Estimate of Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument (Overall HRQoL Estimate)6 months

The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health.

The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.

Physical Functioning as Assessed by the SF-12 HRQoL Instrument Physical Component Summary (PCS)6 months

The short-form 12 item (SF-12) HRQoL health status instrument measures Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). It produces overall HRQoL estimates as well as sub-scale scores (Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS)) that assess both mental/emotional and physical functioning related to health.

The scoring scale is from 0 to 100, the higher the score the better the health related quality of life.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of Patients Who Will be Progressing to Ablation Therapy6 months

Progression to ablation therapy will be determined by patient preference for further intervention.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

🇺🇸

Houston, Texas, United States

The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.