MedPath

Validity of Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Muscular Invasion of Bladder Cancer

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Bladder Cancer
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: CT with contrast
Diagnostic Test: MRI pelvis
Procedure: TURBT
Registration Number
NCT06046469
Lead Sponsor
Menoufia University
Brief Summary

The aim of this work is to compare validity between CT and MRI in detecting muscular invasion in Patients with bladder cancer.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
55
Inclusion Criteria
  • patients with urinary bladder mass
Exclusion Criteria
  • bleeding tendency ,patients had chemo , radiotherapy

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
CT groupCT with contrastthis group of patient is doing CT abdomen and plevis with IV contrast then they undergo TURBT and compare the radiological staging to histopathological staging.
CT groupTURBTthis group of patient is doing CT abdomen and plevis with IV contrast then they undergo TURBT and compare the radiological staging to histopathological staging.
MRI groupMRI pelvisthis group of patient is doing MRI pelvis with contrast then they undergo TURBT and compare the radiological staging to histopathological staging.
MRI groupTURBTthis group of patient is doing MRI pelvis with contrast then they undergo TURBT and compare the radiological staging to histopathological staging.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
which is better to detect muscular invasion in bladder cancer CT vs MRI1 month

the radiological staging of CT and MRI compared to histopathological staging

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Medicine Menofia University

🇪🇬

Shibīn Al Kawm, Menofia, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath