Validity of Computed Tomography Versus Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Muscular Invasion of Bladder Cancer
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Interventions
- Diagnostic Test: CT with contrastDiagnostic Test: MRI pelvisProcedure: TURBT
- Registration Number
- NCT06046469
- Lead Sponsor
- Menoufia University
- Brief Summary
The aim of this work is to compare validity between CT and MRI in detecting muscular invasion in Patients with bladder cancer.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 55
Inclusion Criteria
- patients with urinary bladder mass
Exclusion Criteria
- bleeding tendency ,patients had chemo , radiotherapy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description CT group CT with contrast this group of patient is doing CT abdomen and plevis with IV contrast then they undergo TURBT and compare the radiological staging to histopathological staging. CT group TURBT this group of patient is doing CT abdomen and plevis with IV contrast then they undergo TURBT and compare the radiological staging to histopathological staging. MRI group MRI pelvis this group of patient is doing MRI pelvis with contrast then they undergo TURBT and compare the radiological staging to histopathological staging. MRI group TURBT this group of patient is doing MRI pelvis with contrast then they undergo TURBT and compare the radiological staging to histopathological staging.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method which is better to detect muscular invasion in bladder cancer CT vs MRI 1 month the radiological staging of CT and MRI compared to histopathological staging
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Medicine Menofia University
🇪🇬Shibīn Al Kawm, Menofia, Egypt