Evaluation of wear of natural tooth opposing crowns of different materials
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/03/064627
- Lead Sponsor
- Dr Shivani Anand
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
a)Subjects needing a crown on either 2nd Premolar or 1st molar of any arch.
b)Subjects having normal Class I Angle’s occlusion.
c)Presence of natural antagonist against the proposed full coverage restoration.
d)Presence of same tooth on the contralateral side with natural antagonist for comparative analysis.
e)Subjects with similar facial biotype.
a)Subjects with parafunctional habits, for example bruxism.
b)Subjects with temporomandibular joint disorder and habit of unilateral mastication.
c)Subjects likely to shift out of the area within the 6 months duration of the study.
d)Subjects with excessive wear of posterior teeth i.e. dentinal exposure.
e)Subjects with restored antagonist tooth opposing the test group tooth or the contralateral side tooth.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method )To evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to -: <br/ ><br>I)Monolithic lithium disilicate crown <br/ ><br>II)Monolithic zirconia crowns <br/ ><br>III)PEEK coping layered with lithium disilicate crowns <br/ ><br>Timepoint: baseline, 9 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare wear of natural enamel antagonist to above restorative crowns with enamel to enamel wear on contralateral side in same pair of opposing teeth.Timepoint: baseline, 9 months