MedPath

Periodontal Regeneration Versus Tooth Extraction and Replacement Denture in Teeth With Periodontal Hopeless Prognosis

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Periodontitis Complex
Interventions
Device: Enamel matrix derivative, bone replacement graft, barrier membrane
Procedure: Tooth extraction and replacement
Registration Number
NCT04227964
Lead Sponsor
The European Research Group on Periodontology (ERGOPerio)
Brief Summary

Periodontal regeneration can change tooth prognosis and represents an alternative to extraction in teeth compromised by severe intrabony defects. The aim of this study is to compare periodontal regeneration (PR) with tooth extraction and replacement (TER) in a population with attachment loss to or beyond the apex of the root in terms of professional, patient reported and economic outcomes.

Detailed Description

This was a single center 10-year randomized controlled clinical trial. 50 stage III or IV periodontitis subjects with a severely compromised tooth with attachment loss to or beyond the apex were randomized to PR or TER with either an implant or a tooth supported fixed partial denture. Subjects were kept on a strict periodontal supportive care regimen every 3 months and examined yearly. Survival, complication free survival, recurrence analysis, oral health related quality of life and patient reported outcomes analyses will be performed.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
50
Inclusion Criteria
  • Good general health
  • Non-smokers or smokers with less than 20/day
  • Good oral hygiene (FMPS<25%)
  • Good control of periodontitis (FMBS<25%)
  • Good compliance with treatment
  • Presence of generalised stage III or IV periodontitis
  • Radiographic bone loss to the apex or beyond the apex of the root at at least one interdental aspect
  • Presence of severe clinical attachment level loss (>10 mm)
  • Presence of clearly identifiable crest of bone in adjacent teeth
  • Lack of function due to hyper mobility
  • Vital or non-vital teeth
Exclusion Criteria
  • Medical contraindication to elective surgery
  • Poor oral hygiene
  • Incomplete control of periodontitis in the dentition
  • Inadequate compliance
  • Inability to provide informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Periodontal regenerationEnamel matrix derivative, bone replacement graft, barrier membranePeriodontal regeneration consisting of papilla preservation flaps, application of FDA approved CE marked periodontal regenerative devices, tooth splinting and root canal treatment as required.
Extraction and tooth replacementTooth extraction and replacementTooth extraction and replacement with a dental implant or a fixed partial denture following healing and reconstruction of the extraction area. Choice based on standard of practice.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Tooth or tooth replacement survival10 year

Presence of functional and symptoms free tooth or tooth replacement

Occurrence and cost of management of recurrence10-year

Recurrence analysis

Oral health related quality of life: OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile)10 years

14 validated questions, 5 point Liker scale, smaller scores represent better outcome (smaller impact on quality of life)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Clinical attachment level gain10 years

Control outcome of periodontal regeneration

Probing pocket depth10 years

Control outcome of periodontal regeneration

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong

🇭🇰

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath