Does Gender Play a Role in Bone-mineral Density Measurement Precision?
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 180
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- DXA Bone Mineral Density precision
研究概览
简要总结
Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the current gold standard for osteoporosis diagnosis and therapy monitoring. Like all quantitative tests, there is some variability in BMD results obtained when scanning a person more than once. As such, it is current clinical practice, based on the recommendation of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry, that each technologist perform a precision assessment. This approach consists of scanning 30 people twice; the data from which allow determination of what constitutes a real difference in BMD with 95% confidence. A precision assessment typically evaluates a specific clinic's population, using the age range and genders seen at that clinic. However men generally have larger, but often more arthritic, bones than women which may impact the precision results. Therefore, it is possible that gender-specific precision values should be used in clinical practice, however this issue has never been investigated.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Case Only
- 时间视角
- Cross Sectional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 65 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Age ≥ 65 years
- •Able and willing to sign informed consent
排除标准
- •Inability to have DXA scans performed due to weight ≥ 450 pounds (exceeds densitometer table limit)
- •Metallic hardware in, or overlaying, any of the measured skeletal sites
结局指标
主要结局
DXA Bone Mineral Density precision
时间窗: 1 day
The primary analysis will compare DXA BMD precision (mean square error/variance) in males and females, pooled across technicians, using the two-sample F-test for equality of variances. Separate analyses will also be performed for each technician. In addition, due to the sensitivity of the F-test to the normality assumption, a secondary analysis will perform the same comparisons using Levene's test. A nominal two-sided p-value of 0.05 will be regarded as statistically significant.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
