The Performance-Perceptual Test as a Counseling Tool

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Hearing Impairment
• Interventions: Behavioral: PPT-based Counseling; Behavioral: Standard Educational Counseling

• Registration Number: NCT00126113
• Lead Sponsor: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine whether a new test of ability to understand speech in noise and an associated counseling program can improve hearing aid satisfaction. Participants complete routine hearing tests, some hearing-related questionnaires and the new speech test. One group of participants receives the new form of counseling, the second group does not. Hearing aid satisfaction following 10 weeks hearing aid use is compared across the groups.

Detailed Description

Hearing aid dissatisfaction continues to be disappointingly high, even though hearing aid technology has improved dramatically over the last 10 years or so. Unfortunately, the results of most commonly used self-report measures cannot be directly compared with the results from performance measures since the modes of testing are very different. Thus, it is hard for clinicians to reconcile data from individuals reporting more handicap or less hearing aid satisfaction than would be expected from their performance.

In this study, the investigators use a test known as the Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) to determine whether simple counseling based upon discussion of PPT results can be used to better align perceived and measured ability to understand speech-in-noise; and, more importantly, whether such counseling can decrease reported handicap and improve hearing aid satisfaction.

Hearing aid users complete the PPT for aided and unaided listening, along with standardized questionnaires measuring reported auditory disability, handicap and hearing aid satisfaction. Following this, subjects are randomly assigned to one of two groups. Subjects in Group 1 receive counseling from the experimenter in the form of an explanation and discussion of their PPT results. Subjects in Group 2 also participate in a discussion with the experimenter, but it does not include an explanation of the PPT. Two weeks after enrollment in the study subjects complete a second set of questionnaires. Ten weeks after study enrollment subjects return to the laboratory to rerun the test battery. The impact of the counseling upon PPT values, reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction and benefit will be compared across the two groups.

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design
|
Trial Locations

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2005-08
• Study First Submitted: 2005-08-01
• Study First Submitted QC: 2005-08-01
• Study First Posted: 2005-08-02
• Primary Completion: 2008-11
• Study Completion: 2008-11
• Results First Submitted: 2014-09-26
• Status Verified: 2014-10
• Results First Submitted QC: 2014-10-01
• Results First Posted: 2014-10-06
• Last Update Submitted: 2014-10-06
• Last Update Posted: 2014-10-16

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 74

Inclusion Criteria

• Mild-to-moderate symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss
• Current users of binaural hearing aids

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Conductive hearing impairment or other otological pathology
• A score less than age-based norms on the Mini Mental State Examination
• Asymmetrical hearing loss
• No prior use of hearing aids

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
PPT-based Counseling	PPT-based Counseling	Counseling based on Performance-Perceptual Discrepancy (PPDIS) consisting of explanation of hearing tests plus recommendations based on PPDIS
Standard Educational Counseling	Standard Educational Counseling	Standard educational counseling consisting of explanation of hearing tests

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS)	Day 70 (end of study) only	PIADS: The PIADS measures the psychosocial impact of any assistive device(s). Here that is a hearing aid. The PIADS is a 26-item self-rating scale. The user rates each item on a seven-point scale that ranges from negative 3 (maximum negative impact) to positive 3 (maximum positive impact). The midpoint, zero, indicates no impact or no perceived change resulting from device use. It measures three quality-of-life domains: (1) Adaptability that reflects the inclination or motivation to participate socially and take risks; (2) Competence that reflects perceived functional capability, independence, and performance; and (3) Self-esteem that reflects self-confidence, self esteem, and emotional well-being.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)	Day 70 (end of study)	The IOI-HA is a seven-item questionnaire for which hearing-aid use, hearing-aid benefit, residual activity limitation, hearing-aid satisfaction, residual participation restriction, impact on others, and quality of life are rated on a five-point scale. An overall IOI-HA score is generated by averaging responses to all seven items. Higher scores reflect better self-reported outcome. Scores can range from 7 (poorest outcome) to 35 (best outcome).
Hearing Handicap Inventory (HHI)	Day 70 (end of study)	HHI: The HHI for the elderly is for individuals over age 65 years; the HHI for adults is for individuals aged 65 years and younger. Both are 25-item questionnaires that assess the social and emotional consequences of hearing loss. The versions differ in the wording of three questions. Items are answered on a scale of Yes (4 points), Sometimes (2 points), and No (0 points) with higher scores indicating greater reported hearing handicap. Scores can range from 0 (no handicap) to 100 (maximum handicap).
Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB)	Day 70 (end of study)	APHAB: The APHAB is a 24-item questionnaire that documents hearing difficulties in specified listening situations. Items are answered on a seven-point scale from ' Always ' to ' Never ' with higher scores indicating greater reported hearing disability. The questionnaire has four subscales: Ease of communication, Reverberation, Background noise, and Aversiveness, from which a global score is computed by averaging the Ease of communication, Reverberation, and Background noise scale scores. Questions are answered for unaided and aided listening. By subtracting aided scores from unaided scores a measure of reported aided benefit is obtained. Scores can range from 0 (no disability) to 99 (maximum disability).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

VA Medical Center, Portland; 🇺🇸 Portland, Oregon, United States