MedPath

Fully Constrained Acetabular Liner vs. Dual Mobility Hip Joint in the Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Bone Disease of the Hip

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Metastatic Cancer to the Hip
Interventions
Other: Constrained Liner
Other: Dual Mobility
Registration Number
NCT05461313
Lead Sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Brief Summary

The purpose of the current study is to investigate whether dual mobility liners are non-inferior til constrained liners regarding the post-operative hip joint dislocation risk following total hip replacement in patients with metastatic bone disease of the hip.

Detailed Description

The use of constrained liners in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with metastatic bone disease of the hip (MBD) has increased at our department in recent years to avoid hip dislocation in this high-risk population. Hip surgeons seldom recommend the use of constrained liners in primary surgery due to the risk of polyethylene wear and high revision rates. An alternative to constrained liners are dual mobility cups, which have been shown to decrease the risk of dislocation in other high-risk THA operations such as revision THA and THA in hip fracture patients, while providing the added benefit of a less restricted range of motion of the joint. This study will investigate whether dual mobility cups are non-inferior to constrained liners regarding the post-operative joint dislocation risk in patients with MBD.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
146
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosed with metastatic bone disease of the hip defined as bone lesions in the proximal femur because of secondary malignant growth of a primary cancer located elsewhere or bone lesions in the proximal femur due to hematological malignancies
  • Determined eligible for total hip arthroplasty for metastatic bone disease of the hip and is planned to undergo surgery at the study site
  • Provides informed consent prior to initiation of any study-specific activities/procedures
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous osteosynthesis or endoprosthetic surgery of the ipsilateral hip
  • Pelvic reconstruction of the ipsilateral hip
  • Total femoral replacement of the ipsilateral femur
  • It is not surgically viable to insert an acetabular cup and/or a femoral stem
  • Subject is currently or has previously been enrolled in this study
  • Subject is incapable of understanding the patient information or unable to provide informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Constrained LinerConstrained Liner-
Dual Mobility CupDual Mobility-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Post-operative joint dislocation risk6 months

The 6-months hip dislocation rate in patients receiving a dual mobility cup compared to patients receiving a constrained liner for the surgical treatment of MBD

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Implant survival3 and 6 months

The 3-months and 6-months implant survival in patients receiving a dual mobility cup compared to patients receiving a constrained liner.

Harris Hip Score3 and 6 months

The 3-months and 6-months HHS in patients receiving a dual mobility cup compared to patients receiving a constrained liner and who are alive at the defined time point

Post-operative joint dislocation risk3 months

The 3-months hip dislocation rate in patients receiving a dual mobility cup compared to patients receiving a constrained liner.

Overall survival3 and 6 months

The 3-months and 6-months overall survival in patients receiving a dual mobility cup compared to patients receiving a constrained liner.

Post-surgical and prosthesis related complications6 months

The incidence of post-surgical and prosthesis-related complications in patients receiving a dual mobility cup compared to patients receiving a constrained liner. These include but are not limited to deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, wound infections, periprosthetic infections, periprosthetic fractures etc.

Karnofsky Performance Status Score3 and 6 months

The 3-months and 6-months Karnofsky Performance Status Score in patients receiving a dual mobility cup compared to patients receiving a constrained liner and who are alive at the defined time point.

Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Score3 and 6 months

The 3-months and 6-months MSTS in patients receiving a dual mobility cup compared to patients receiving a constrained liner and who are alive at the defined time point

European Quality of Life - 5 Dimensions Questionnaire3 and 6 months

The 3-months and 6-months Eq-5d score in patients receiving a dual mobility cup compared to patients receiving a constrained liner and who are alive at the defined time point

Toronto Extremities Salvage Score for the lower extremity3 and 6 months

The 3-months and 6-months TESS in patients receiving a dual mobility cup compared to patients receiving a constrained liner and who are alive at the defined time point

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rigshospitalet

🇩🇰

Copenhagen, Denmark

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath