Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/TCTR20181224002
TCTR20181224002
Recruiting
N/A

COMPARISON THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT POSITION BETWEEN STATIC AND DYNAMIC COMPUTER-ASSISTED IMPLANT SURGERY WITH TWO-IMPLANT SUPPORT FIXED PARTIAL PROSTHESIS

Chulalongkorn University0 sites60 target enrollmentDecember 24, 2018
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
Conditionsaccuracy of implant positionComputer Assisted Implant Surgery (CAIS)&#44Static CAIS&#44Dynamic CAIS&#44Accuracy of implant position&#44Dental implant support fixed partial denture

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
accuracy of implant position
Sponsor
Chulalongkorn University
Enrollment
60
Status
Recruiting
Last Updated
last year
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
December 24, 2018
End Date
July 31, 2019
Last Updated
last year
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Inclusion criteria
  • •1\.Patients who have edentulous space which require two dental fixtures support fixed partial denture.
  • •2\.Extractions completed at least 2 months prior to implant placement.
  • •3\.No limited mouth opening for placing surgical guide and drill.
  • •4\.Age 20 years and over.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Exclusion criteria
  • •1\.Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases or conditions that would affect to dental implant treatment.
  • •2\.Clinical or radiographic signs presents any pathology in the jaw bone.
  • •3\.Patients on orthodontic appliance.
  • •4\.Patients with pathological mobility of adjacent teeth that supported surgical guide.
  • •5\.Patients underwent perioperative complications that make surgical guide less accurate, such as surgical guide fractures, surgical guide incline that affect to mis\-alignment of implant position.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Recruiting
N/A
Comparison The Accuracy Of Implant Position Among Mental, Static And Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery In Totally Edentulous PatientsAccuracy of the implant position
TCTR20190125002Chulalongkorn University60
Not Yet Recruiting
N/A
To compare the correctness of 3D printed and conventionally prepared surgical guide in implantplacement in bilateral lower back teeth regioHealth Condition 1: K068- Other specified disorders of gingiva and edentulous alveolar ridge
CTRI/2023/05/052587Jyoti Kutum
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of implant placement accuracy between experienced and inexperienced operator in immediate socket and healed site using Dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (X-guide) in esthetic zone : In vitro studyHealthy dentistDynamic Navigation, dynamic CAIS, implant, immediate socket, healed site
TCTR20240504005Esthetic Restorative and implant Dentistry, Faculty of dentistry, Chulalongkorn University6
Not Yet Recruiting
N/A
To compare the accuracy of dental implants placed using two different types of surgical guides, namely the conventional one and the 3D printed.
CTRI/2019/08/020661Dr Firasat Husain
Completed
N/A
Comparison Of Implant Accuracy Between Immediate And Healed Site Using Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery (X-guide) In Posterior Region: In Vitro StudyHealthy dentistDynamic navigation, Dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery system (X-guide), Accuracy, Immediate socket, Healed socket, Experienced operator, Inexperienced operator.
TCTR20240503002Esthetic Restorative and Implant Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University6