TCTR20200128003Recruiting未知
The comparative study of implant position between using only surgical drilled guide and surgical drilled guide with implant guide : A randomized clinical trial
Chiangmai University0 sites30 target enrollmentStarted: January 28, 2020Last updated:
Conditions
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- 未知
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sponsor
- Enrollment
- 30
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 20 Years to 65 Years (—)
- Sex
- All
Inclusion Criteria
- •General criteria
- •1. No contraindication for minor oral surgery
- •2. No psychiatric disorders
- •3. No bleeding disorders
- •4. No smoking or smoke less than 10 cigarettes per day during in recent 5 years
- •5. No intravenous injection of bisphosphonate
- •6. Never received radiotherapy around head and neck regions
- •7. Good oral hygiene
- •8. To be able and to agree undergo treatment and follow-up at least 1 year
- •Implant site
- •1. Single tooth edentulous area
- •2. Presence of mesial and distal neighboring teeth
- •2. Stable occlusion, no severe occlusal interference
- •3. Normal soft tissue, keratinized tissue ≥ 2 mm.
- •4. Adequate bone quantity for implant placement which is implant surrounding bone ≥ 1mm after surgery. No need bone augmentation.
- •5. Sites with previous bone augmentation
- •6. No parafunctional habit
Exclusion Criteria
- •Exclusion criteria
- •1. Uncontrolled systemic disease
- •2. Heavy smoking (≥ 10 cigarettes/day)
- •3. Alcoholism or drug abuse
- •4. Previous or present radiotherapy around head and neck regions
- •5. Infection at implant site
- •6. Unable to maintain good oral hygiene
- •7. Patients who are unable to provide informed consent
- •8. Conditions that would prevent completion of study participation
- •9. On intravenous-injection bisphosphonate medication
Investigators
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Unknown
Comparison of the ideal position of the implant in the aesthetic areaThe subject of the study is not a disease and two methods of implantation.IRCT20240212060982N1Islamic Azad University24
Completed
Not Applicable
The accuracy of static versus dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: a randomized controlled trialsingle missing toothneed of single implant restorationaccuracycomputer assisted implant surgerystereolithographic templatenavigation systemTCTR20180826001Chulalongkorn University60
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison The Accuracy Of Implant Position Among Mental, Static And Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery In Totally Edentulous PatientsAccuracy of the implant positionTCTR20190125002Chulalongkorn University60
Not yet recruiting
Unknown
Comparing the impact of two different designs of dental implants on how stable they are when used in a procedure where they are immediately loaded for function.CTRI/2024/03/064899Janvi Kalra
Completed
Phase 2
Comparison of implant placement accuracy between experienced and inexperienced operator in immediate socket and healed site using Dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery (X-guide) in esthetic zone : In vitro studyHealthy dentistDynamic Navigation, dynamic CAIS, implant, immediate socket, healed siteTCTR20240504005Esthetic Restorative and implant Dentistry, Faculty of dentistry, Chulalongkorn University6