ARYNGEAL VIEW USING CONVENTIONAL LARYNGOSCOPE AND VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPE IN ADULT PATIENTS
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: X- New Technology
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/08/035764
- Lead Sponsor
- Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patients undergoing elective surgery requiring intubation
American society of anesthesiology grade I-II
Patients with ability to sit and open their mouth
Exclusion Criteria
PREGNANCY
PRESENCE OF AIRWAY PATHOLOGY(INFECTIOUS/NEOPLASTIC)
PATIENTS WITH HISTORY OF BURNS OR TRAUMA TO AIRWAY
PATIENTS WITH RESTRICTED MOBILITY OF NECK AND MANDIBLE
ALL PATIENTS WITH UNSTABLE CERVICAL SPINE
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the laryngeal view (Cormack and Lehane grading) by conventional laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy using C-MAC video laryngoscope, in adults undergoing surgery and comparing it with preoperatively assessed Modified Mallampati scoreTimepoint: 72 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the conventional laryngoscopy with that of video laryngoscopy using C-MAC video laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation in adults undergoing surgery in terms of: <br/ ><br>time taken to achieve best glottic view, <br/ ><br>Number of maneuvers used, <br/ ><br>Time taken for intubation <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 72 weeks