CTRI/2016/12/007546已完成2 期
A comparative efficacy of a new anesthetic technique with conventional nerve block Anesthesia - A randomised double blinded clinical trial - A pilot study
saveetha dental college0 个研究点目标入组 656 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 2 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 656
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •irreversible pulpitis. Patient with moderate to severe spontaneous pain and exhibited a positive response to the electric pulp test (EPT).Only patients with moderate to severe pain were taken up for this study (NRS > 4).
排除标准
- •Exclusion criteria included any reported allergy to local anesthetic agents, unstable cardiovascular disease and pregnancy, neurologic disorders with sensory disturbance and not able to provide written
研究者
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Comparison of two different anesthetic techniques for femur neck fractureFemur Neck fractureJPRN-UMIN000002587Department of anesthesiology, Kitasato Institute Hospital50
已完成
不适用
To compare the anaesthetic efficiency of intraligamentary injection of 3 different anaesthetic agents.CTRI/2021/04/032666DrManan Shroff99
尚未招募
Unknown
Anesthetics efficiency of 1.8 ml: inferior alveolar nerve block with Lidocaine, mental nerve block with Articaine, infiltration with Articaine, in irreversible pulpitis of mandibular caninesPulpitisIRCT20210515051306N4Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences165
尚未招募
Unknown
Anesthesia safety checklist for caesarean section deliveriesCTRI/2023/09/057174Dr Kona Venkata Krishna Yashwanth
已完成
不适用
Comparative Effects of Two Anesthetic Techniques on Auditory Brain Response in ChildrenAuditory Brainstem ResponseNCT02830815Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati80