IRCT20210515051306N4
Not yet recruiting
未知
Comparative evaluation of anesthetics efficiency of 1.8 ml: inferior alveolar nerve block with Lidocaine, mental nerve block with Articaine, infiltration with Articaine, in irreversible pulpitis of mandibular canines
Overview
- Phase
- 未知
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences
- Enrollment
- 165
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Healthy adult patients 18 to 60 years old
- •Having a mandibular canine tooth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
- •Normal periapical radiographic appearance
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients under age of 18 and over the age of 60 years
- •American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) III,IV patients
- •Pregnancy or breasfeeding
- •Any type of medication that could potentially interact with the anesthetic solution
- •Spontaneous pain
- •Periodontal disease or unable to get restoration
- •Having pain killer late 12 hours
- •History of sensititivity to 4% articaine, 2% lidocaine or epinephrine
- •Widening PDL
- •Radiolucency in radiography
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Unknown
Phase 1
Evaluation on post treatment pain in patients undergoing Root Canal Treatment with 3 agents Lignocaine,sodium Diclofenac, Ketorolac tromethamine.Health Condition 1: K040- PulpitisCTRI/2020/09/027635Dr Meghna Kothari198
Completed
Not Applicable
To compare the anaesthetic efficiency of intraligamentary injection of 3 different anaesthetic agents.Health Condition 1: K00-K14- Diseases of oral cavity and salivary glandsCTRI/2021/04/032666DrManan Shroff99
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy Using Needleless Pressure Injection Technique and Conventional Injection Technique for Dental Extraction Using Infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline: A Randomized Controlled Clinical StudyCTRI/2024/04/065074MGM dental college and hospital
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparative Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy and Pain on Injection of Buffered and Unbuffered 4% Articaine with 1:100000 Adrenaline for Mandibular Molar Extractions using Infiltrations techniquesHealth Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecifiedCTRI/2024/03/064030shubham prajapati
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of two different anesthetic agents in extraction of milk teethCTRI/2023/06/053896Pooja Gupta