CTRI/2023/06/053896尚未招募Unknown
Comparative Evaluation Of Anaesthetic Efficacy Of 4% Articaine Vs 2% Lignocaine Infiltration For Extraction In Primary Teeth: A Randomized Control Trial
Pooja Gupta0 个研究点目标入组 0 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- Unknown
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •Children within age group of 5 years and above.
- •Medically fit (ASA I, II).
- •Mentally capable of communication.
- •Cooperative behaviour for dental treatment under local anaesthesia.
- •(FRANKL behaviour rating scale is used for behaviour assessment)
- •Having a primary molar tooth that required extraction.
- •Root resorption of the tooth requiring treatment is more than one-thirds of the root
排除标准
- •Medically and mentally compromised children.
- •Children who weigh less than 20 kg.
- •History of allergy to any constituents of local anesthesia.
研究者
相似试验
已完成
2 期
Evaluating the effect of conventional local anaesthesia anaesthesia (lignocaine), warming it and adding a buffer on the success of a nerve block in lower primary posterior teethCTRI/2017/02/007922Reenu Sarah Kurien50
尚未招募
4 期
Comparative Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy and Pain on Injection of Buffered and Unbuffered 4% Articaine with 1:100000 Adrenaline for Mandibular Molar Extractions using Infiltrations techniquesCTRI/2024/03/064030shubham prajapati
已完成
4 期
A clinical trial to compare the effects of two drugs, Articaine and Lidocaine in pain control during dental treatment, assessed through different methodsCTRI/2020/09/027998Anu V F55
尚未招募
2 期
Comparative evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of needleless anesthesia and conventional anesthesia in patients with Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. A Randomized Clinical TrialCTRI/2021/12/038471Krishnakanth Jaju
进行中（未招募）
不适用
Dental research comparing two types of local anaesthetic in dental treatment of children's teeth.Dental caries in primary molarsEUCTR2011-004711-23-GBeeds Dental Institute