CTRI/2024/03/064030
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparative Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy and Pain on Injection of Buffered and Unbuffered 4% Articaine with 1:100000 Adrenaline for Mandibular Molar Extractions using Infiltrations techniques- A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Study
shubham prajapati0 sites0 target enrollmentTBD
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified
- Sponsor
- shubham prajapati
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Participant in the age group 18\-60 years of age.
- •Participant indicated for mandibular molar extraction.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1\. Participant with known allergy to amide type of local
- •anaesthetic agent and adrenaline.
- •2\. Participants having active local infections, abscessor any
- •other lesion at the injection site.
- •3\. Participant with systemic co\-morbidities that would
- •preclude adminstration of local anaestheisa or adrenaline
- •( eg\- disorders of liver, kidney, cardiovascular system, etc)
- •or are contraindication of extraction.
- •4\. Participant taking medications such as sedative, narcotics,
- •antidepressants or antianxiety medications 1 week prior to
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of two different anesthetic agents in extraction of milk teethCTRI/2023/06/053896Pooja Gupta
Completed
Phase 2
Evaluating the effect of conventional local anaesthesia anaesthesia (lignocaine), warming it and adding a buffer on the success of a nerve block in lower primary posterior teethHealth Condition 1: null- children aged 6-12 years, with bilateral vital pulp involvement in primary mandibular molars.CTRI/2017/02/007922Reenu Sarah Kurien50
Unknown
Phase 1
Evaluation on post treatment pain in patients undergoing Root Canal Treatment with 3 agents Lignocaine,sodium Diclofenac, Ketorolac tromethamine.Health Condition 1: K040- PulpitisCTRI/2020/09/027635Dr Meghna Kothari198
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy Using Needleless Pressure Injection Technique and Conventional Injection Technique for Dental Extraction Using Infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline: A Randomized Controlled Clinical StudyCTRI/2024/04/065074MGM dental college and hospital
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
Comparative evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of needleless anesthesia and conventional anesthesia in patients with Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. A Randomized Clinical TrialHealth Condition 1: K040- PulpitisCTRI/2021/12/038471Krishnakanth Jaju