Comparative Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy and Pain on Injection of Buffered and Unbuffered 4% Articaine with 1:100000 Adrenaline for Mandibular Molar Extractions using Infiltrations techniques
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/03/064030
- Lead Sponsor
- shubham prajapati
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Participant in the age group 18-60 years of age.
Participant indicated for mandibular molar extraction.
1. Participant with known allergy to amide type of local
anaesthetic agent and adrenaline.
2. Participants having active local infections, abscessor any
other lesion at the injection site.
3. Participant with systemic co-morbidities that would
preclude adminstration of local anaestheisa or adrenaline
( eg- disorders of liver, kidney, cardiovascular system, etc)
or are contraindication of extraction.
4. Participant taking medications such as sedative, narcotics,
antidepressants or antianxiety medications 1 week prior to
procedure and NSAIDS 3 days prior to procedure.
5. Pregnancy.
6. Alcohol consumption 48 hours before of study.
7. Participants not willing to participate in the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method There is a difference in anaesthetic efficacy between buffered and <br/ ><br>nonbuffered 4% articaine with 1:100000 for mandibular molar <br/ ><br>extractions using infiltration technique. <br/ ><br>Timepoint: 1-immediate
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method There is a difference in pain on injection between buffered & <br/ ><br>nonbuffered 4% articaine with 1:100000 for mandibular molar <br/ ><br>extractions using infiltration techniqueTimepoint: 1