CTRI/2024/03/064030Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Comparative Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy and Pain on Injection of Buffered and Unbuffered 4% Articaine with 1:100000 Adrenaline for Mandibular Molar Extractions using Infiltrations techniques- A Prospective Randomized Double Blind Study
shubham prajapati0 sites0 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Participant in the age group 18-60 years of age.
- •Participant indicated for mandibular molar extraction.
Exclusion Criteria
- •1. Participant with known allergy to amide type of local
- •anaesthetic agent and adrenaline.
- •2. Participants having active local infections, abscessor any
- •other lesion at the injection site.
- •3. Participant with systemic co-morbidities that would
- •preclude adminstration of local anaestheisa or adrenaline
- •( eg- disorders of liver, kidney, cardiovascular system, etc)
- •or are contraindication of extraction.
- •4. Participant taking medications such as sedative, narcotics,
- •antidepressants or antianxiety medications 1 week prior to
- •procedure and NSAIDS 3 days prior to procedure.
- •5. Pregnancy.
- •6. Alcohol consumption 48 hours before of study.
- •7. Participants not willing to participate in the study.
Investigators
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Unknown
Comparison of two different anesthetic agents in extraction of milk teethCTRI/2023/06/053896Pooja Gupta
Completed
Phase 2
Evaluating the effect of conventional local anaesthesia anaesthesia (lignocaine), warming it and adding a buffer on the success of a nerve block in lower primary posterior teethCTRI/2017/02/007922Reenu Sarah Kurien50
Unknown
Phase 1
Evaluation on post treatment pain in patients undergoing Root Canal Treatment with 3 agents Lignocaine,sodium Diclofenac, Ketorolac tromethamine.CTRI/2020/09/027635Dr Meghna Kothari198
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy Using Needleless Pressure Injection Technique and Conventional Injection Technique for Dental Extraction Using Infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline: A Randomized Controlled Clinical StudyCTRI/2024/04/065074MGM dental college and hospital
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
Comparative evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of needleless anesthesia and conventional anesthesia in patients with Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. A Randomized Clinical TrialCTRI/2021/12/038471Krishnakanth Jaju