Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy Using Needleless Pressure Injection Technique and Conventional Injection Technique for Dental Extraction Using Infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
Phase 4
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/04/065074
- Lead Sponsor
- MGM dental college and hospital
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Patients in the age group 18-60 years.
Both Male and Female patients.
Patients indicated for extractions of single tooth which can be extracted using infiltration technique
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with known allergy to amide type of local anesthetic agent Patients having active local infections, abscess or any other lesion at the injection site.
Patients with systemic co-morbidities that would preclude administration of local anesthesia or adrenaline (eg- disorders of liver, kidney, cardiovascular system, etc.) or are contraindication of extraction. Patients taking medications such as anticoagulant
Alcohol consumption 48 hours before of study.
Patients not willing to participate in the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate and compare the Anesthetic efficacy using needleless <br/ ><br>pressure injection technique and conventional injection technique <br/ ><br>during dental extraction using infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and <br/ ><br>1:2,00,000 AdrenalineTimepoint: Immediate after 7 days
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To evaluate & compare the Anesthetic efficacy using needleless <br/ ><br>pressure injection technique & conventional injection technique <br/ ><br>during dental extraction using infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and <br/ ><br>1:2,00,000 AdrenalineTimepoint: Immediate after 7 days