CTRI/2024/04/065074
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparative Evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy Using Needleless PressureInjection Technique and Conventional Injection Technique for Dental ExtractionUsing Infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline: A RandomizedControlled Clinical Study - NI
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- MGM dental college and hospital
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Last Updated
- 2 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients in the age group 18\-60 years.
- •Both Male and Female patients.
- •Patients indicated for extractions of single tooth which can be extracted using infiltration technique
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients with known allergy to amide type of local anesthetic agent Patients having active local infections, abscess or any other lesion at the injection site.
- •Patients with systemic co\-morbidities that would preclude administration of local anesthesia or adrenaline (eg\- disorders of liver, kidney, cardiovascular system, etc.) or are contraindication of extraction. Patients taking medications such as anticoagulant
- •Alcohol consumption 48 hours before of study.
- •Patients not willing to participate in the study.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Unknown
Phase 1
Evaluation on post treatment pain in patients undergoing Root Canal Treatment with 3 agents Lignocaine,sodium Diclofenac, Ketorolac tromethamine.Health Condition 1: K040- PulpitisCTRI/2020/09/027635Dr Meghna Kothari198
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparative Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy and Pain on Injection of Buffered and Unbuffered 4% Articaine with 1:100000 Adrenaline for Mandibular Molar Extractions using Infiltrations techniquesHealth Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecifiedCTRI/2024/03/064030shubham prajapati
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
Comparative evaluation of Anesthetic Efficacy of needleless anesthesia and conventional anesthesia in patients with Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. A Randomized Clinical TrialHealth Condition 1: K040- PulpitisCTRI/2021/12/038471Krishnakanth Jaju
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of two different anesthetic agents in extraction of milk teethCTRI/2023/06/053896Pooja Gupta
Completed
Phase 2
Evaluating the effect of conventional local anaesthesia anaesthesia (lignocaine), warming it and adding a buffer on the success of a nerve block in lower primary posterior teethHealth Condition 1: null- children aged 6-12 years, with bilateral vital pulp involvement in primary mandibular molars.CTRI/2017/02/007922Reenu Sarah Kurien50