CTRI/2020/09/027635Other1 期
A Comparative Evaluation Of Anesthetic Efficiency Of Nerve Block Along With Adjuvant Intraligamentary Injection Of lignocaine, Diclofenac sodium And Ketorolac Tromethamine On Reduction Of Intra Appointment Endodontic Pain In Normal And Hypertensive Patients With Irreversible Pulpitis - A Randomized Clinical Study
Dr Meghna Kothari0 个研究点目标入组 198 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
试验速览
- 阶段
- 1 期
- 状态
- Other
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 198
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
入选标准
- •1.The patients between 18 to 60 years of age with mandibular teeth where mandibular nerve block is required to anesthetize the tooth.
- •2.Patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis with hot tooth.
- •3.Patients having history of stage 1 and 2 hypertension and undergoing regular treatment.
- •4.Patients having no systemic diseases other hypertension would be included.
- •5.Patient should have actively experiencing moderate to severe pain on VAS scale of 5 or more.
- •6.Teeth with no well defined periapical radiolucency seen on radiographic examination.
- •7.Patients with history of previous initiation root canal therapy.
- •8.A written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and only those patients ready to sign the consent letter
排除标准
- •1. Patients with known hypersensitivity to diclofenac sodium, ketorolac tromethamine and lignocaine.
- •2. Patients who are pregnant or lactating
- •3. Patients who are contraindicated for NSAIDs
- •4. Patients who have undergone cardiac surgery in last 6 months
- •5. Patients with fractured or visibly cracked tooth, developmental anomalies, pathology or open apex related to study teeth.
- •6. Patients who had taken NSAIDS within 24 hrs before administration of study drug.
- •(antibiotic as such no criteria required)
研究者
相似试验
尚未招募
Unknown
Anesthetics efficiency of 1.8 ml: inferior alveolar nerve block with Lidocaine, mental nerve block with Articaine, infiltration with Articaine, in irreversible pulpitis of mandibular caninesPulpitisIRCT20210515051306N4Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences165
尚未招募
4 期
Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy Using Needleless Pressure Injection Technique and Conventional Injection Technique for Dental Extraction Using Infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline: A Randomized Controlled Clinical StudyCTRI/2024/04/065074MGM dental college and hospital
尚未招募
4 期
Comparative Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy and Pain on Injection of Buffered and Unbuffered 4% Articaine with 1:100000 Adrenaline for Mandibular Molar Extractions using Infiltrations techniquesCTRI/2024/03/064030shubham prajapati
尚未招募
Unknown
Comparison of two different anesthetic agents in extraction of milk teethCTRI/2023/06/053896Pooja Gupta
已完成
2 期
Evaluating the effect of conventional local anaesthesia anaesthesia (lignocaine), warming it and adding a buffer on the success of a nerve block in lower primary posterior teethCTRI/2017/02/007922Reenu Sarah Kurien50
