Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2020/09/027635
CTRI/2020/09/027635
Other
Phase 1

A Comparative Evaluation Of Anesthetic Efficiency Of Nerve Block Along With Adjuvant Intraligamentary Injection Of lignocaine, Diclofenac sodium And Ketorolac Tromethamine On Reduction Of Intra Appointment Endodontic Pain In Normal And Hypertensive Patients With Irreversible Pulpitis - A Randomized Clinical Study

Dr Meghna Kothari0 sites198 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsHealth Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis

Overview

Phase
Phase 1
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Health Condition 1: K040- Pulpitis
Sponsor
Dr Meghna Kothari
Enrollment
198
Status
Other
Last Updated
4 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
November 30, 2020
Last Updated
4 years ago
Study Type
Interventional

Investigators

Sponsor
Dr Meghna Kothari

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1\.The patients between 18 to 60 years of age with mandibular teeth where mandibular nerve block is required to anesthetize the tooth.
  • •2\.Patients diagnosed with irreversible pulpitis with hot tooth.
  • •3\.Patients having history of stage 1 and 2 hypertension and undergoing regular treatment.
  • •4\.Patients having no systemic diseases other hypertension would be included.
  • •5\.Patient should have actively experiencing moderate to severe pain on VAS scale of 5 or more.
  • •6\.Teeth with no well defined periapical radiolucency seen on radiographic examination.
  • •7\.Patients with history of previous initiation root canal therapy.
  • •8\.A written informed consent will be taken from all the patients and only those patients ready to sign the consent letter

Exclusion Criteria

  • •1\. Patients with known hypersensitivity to diclofenac sodium, ketorolac tromethamine and lignocaine.
  • •2\. Patients who are pregnant or lactating
  • •3\. Patients who are contraindicated for NSAIDs
  • •4\. Patients who have undergone cardiac surgery in last 6 months
  • •5\. Patients with fractured or visibly cracked tooth, developmental anomalies, pathology or open apex related to study teeth.
  • •6\. Patients who had taken NSAIDS within 24 hrs before administration of study drug.
  • •(antibiotic as such no criteria required)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Anesthetics efficiency of 1.8 ml: inferior alveolar nerve block with Lidocaine, mental nerve block with Articaine, infiltration with Articaine, in irreversible pulpitis of mandibular canines
IRCT20210515051306N4Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences165
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy Using Needleless Pressure Injection Technique and Conventional Injection Technique for Dental Extraction Using Infiltration with 2% Lignocaine and 1:2,00,000 Adrenaline: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
CTRI/2024/04/065074MGM dental college and hospital
Not yet recruiting
Phase 4
Comparative Evaluation of Anaesthetic Efficacy and Pain on Injection of Buffered and Unbuffered 4% Articaine with 1:100000 Adrenaline for Mandibular Molar Extractions using Infiltrations techniquesHealth Condition 1: K029- Dental caries, unspecified
CTRI/2024/03/064030shubham prajapati
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of two different anesthetic agents in extraction of milk teeth
CTRI/2023/06/053896Pooja Gupta
Completed
Phase 2
Evaluating the effect of conventional local anaesthesia anaesthesia (lignocaine), warming it and adding a buffer on the success of a nerve block in lower primary posterior teethHealth Condition 1: null- children aged 6-12 years, with bilateral vital pulp involvement in primary mandibular molars.
CTRI/2017/02/007922Reenu Sarah Kurien50