Comparative studies of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine used as mandibular infiltration versus 2% Lidocaine used as inferior dental nerve block, in extraction and pulpotomy of mandibular primary molars in children. - Use of Articaine in Children Dentistry

eeds Dental Institute0 个研究点开始时间: 2013年5月1日最近更新: 2015年8月4日

适应症

试验速览

暂无简介。

•a) Children aged 5–9 years.
•b) Medically fit (ASA I,II).
•c) Requiring extraction /restoration (pulpotomy treatment) of primary mandibular molar teeth
•under local anaesthetic.
•d) Understanding of English.
•e) Mentally capable of communication.
•f) Tooth without history of infection (abscess) or swelling and no evidence of periapical
•pathosis or soft tissue infection/inflammation near site of injection.
•g) Root resorption of the primary tooth must be less than two-thirds of the root.
•h) Child must give assent form prior to participation, as well as parental informed written
•i) Body weight more than 20 Kg.
•Are the trial subjects under 18? yes
•Number of subjects for this age range: 110
•F.1.2 Adults (18-64 years) no
•F.1.2.1 Number of subjects for this age range 0
•F.1.3 Elderly (>=65 years) no
•F.1.3.1 Number of subjects for this age range 0

•a) Medically and mentally compromised children.
•b) History of significant behaviour management problems
•c) Evidence of infection near the proposed injection site as this might affect the efficacy of local anaesthesia.
•d) Child does not speak English.

发起方

eeds Dental Institute