跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00613184
NCT00613184Unknown不适用

Comparison of Nylon Flocked Swabs and Saline Aspirates for Detection Respiratory Viruses

Kern Medical Center0 个研究点目标入组 150 人开始时间: 2006年11月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
150
主要终点
Viral detection rate by PCR

研究概览

简要总结

Collection of nasal secretions from infants and toddlers for viral testing is usually done using the nasal washing technique described by Hall in 1975. This is cumbersome. Previous attempts to use swabs have been unsuccessful because the swabs didn't work well. A newly designed swab may work better and in this study we compare the new swab with the old style nasal washing.

.

详细描述

Collection of nasal secretions from infants and toddlers for viral testing is typically performed using the nasal saline aspirate technique described by Hall in 1975.

Nylon flocked swabs (NFS) and universal transport medium for room temperature (UTM-RT) (Copan Medical, Murrieta, CA) storage media have been found to be an effective collection and transport method for bacteria causing sexually transmitted infections.

We adapted these swabs and storage medium to collect respiratory viruses from children less than18 months old and compared detection rates using NFS and traditional nasal aspirates. We will determine the relative roles of the UTM-RT and NFS release and therefore measured viral detection rates of common respiratory pathogens in traditional saline aspirates stored in UTM-RT.

Our primary hypothesis is that nasal secretions collection using NFS stored in UTM-RT will lead to a higher detection rate of the respiratory viruses we arestudying; namely RSV, Influenza and human metapneumovirus from than collection of unpreserved saline nasal aspirates in children less than 18 months of age.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
— 至 18 Months(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Treating clinican ordered RSV antigen testing

排除标准

  • Refusal of consent
  • Age > 18 months

结局指标

主要结局

Viral detection rate by PCR

时间窗: 0 not applicable

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other

相似试验