Evaluation of Bilateral Alveolar Cleft Grafting With Micro Plate Stabilization Versus Conventional Grafting Technique
- Conditions
- Alveolar Cleft
- Registration Number
- NCT06523855
- Lead Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to enhance the maxillary segments stability during graft healing using microplate fixation to be compared with conventional grafting technique regarding gained bone quality and quantity.
- Detailed Description
In conventional cleft grafting technique, there is always risk for grafted bone resorption and recurrence of fistula formation. So alveolar cleft grafting using anterior iliac crest bone particles combined with microplate fixation of maxillary segments will work more efficient and prevent the fore mentioned risk of graft resorption and recurrence of fistula.
In conventional cleft grafting techniques, most of the cases reported in literature raised a debate regarding the final gained amount of bone, with subsequent recurrence of oronasal fistula. In this study, alveolar cleft grafting using anterior iliac crest bone particles combined with microplate fixation of maxillary segments and the conventional grafting technique will be compared to evaluate which technique will offer better reconstruction of the alveolar ridge with maintained bone width and height.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 12
- Patients with bilateral complete maxillary alveolar cleft at the age of mixed dentition (between 9 and 12 years old).
- repaired cleft lip.
- Patients with medical history that did not hinder surgical intervention and have adequate proper oral hygiene.
- Both genders males and females will be included.
- General contraindications to surgical intervention of the area.
- Patients with unilateral maxillary alveolar cleft.
- Patients with ill repaired cleft lip that will hinder the appropriate reconstruction of the alveolar cleft
- Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before surgery.
- Untreated periodontitis.
- Poor oral hygiene.
- Uncontrolled diabetes.
- Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised.
- Active infection or severe inflammation in the area intended for graft placement
- Unable to open mouth sufficiently to accommodate the surgical tooling.
- Patients participating in other studies, if the present protocol could not be properly followed.
- Unable to attend a 9-month follow-up.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Bone density immediate versus 6 months postoperatively. 6 months bone density changes are measured using CBCT after 6 months via HU
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Bone width and height immediate versus 6 months postoperatively 6 months bone height and width changes are measured using CBCT after 6 months in mm
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo university
🇪🇬Cairo, Egypt
Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo university🇪🇬Cairo, EgyptMohamed Omara, PhDContact01144452862mohammed.omara@dentistry.cu.edu.eg
