Facial Gingival Level Evaluation Following Soft Tissue Augmentation Using Connective Tissue Graft Around Immediate Dental Implants Versus Immediate Dental Implants Alone in the Esthetic Zone. Randomized Controlled Trial.
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Immediate Dental Implants Connective Tissue Graft Esthetic Zone
- Sponsor
- Cairo University
- Enrollment
- 18
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Facial gingival level
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Aim of current study to evaluate connective tissue graft combined with immediate implant placement as an innovative option for less facial gingival tissue recession, less pocket depth and less clinical attachment loss versus immediate implant alone.
Detailed Description
P: Adult patients with single or multiple non-restorable teeth in esthetic zone I: Immediate implant + Connective tissue graft. C: Immediate implant alone. O: Primary Outcome: Facial gingival level Secondary Outcome: Patient satisfaction, probing depth, probing attachment loss, tissue biotype, keratinized mucosal width and bleeding on probing. P.M will select patients from the outpatient clinic of the Oral Medicine and Periodontology Department - Cairo University. Screening of patients will continue until the target population is achieved. Identifying and recruiting potential subjects is achieved through patient database.
Investigators
Parryhan Mohamed Abdelsamie
Assistant lecturer
Cairo University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients with single or multiple non-restorable teeth in maxillary anterior or premolar area.
- •Patients with adequate bone volume for the dental implant procedure.
- •Patients who are compliant to oral hygiene measures.
- •Patient consent approval and signing.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Heavy smokers.
- •Systemic disease that contraindicates implant placement or surgical procedures.
- •No or poor patient's compliance.
- •Psychological problems.
- •Pathology at the site of intervention.
- •Pregnancy females.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Facial gingival level
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
FGL was evaluated by measuring the distance between the level of soft tissues and the lower border of the customized template that was used as a reference line at three readings mesially, mid-facially and distally.
Secondary Outcomes
- Pain score(Up to 12 days)
- Pink esthetic score(Up to 6 months)
- Probing attachment level(Up to 6 months)
- Width of keratinized mucosa(Up to 6 months)
- Patient satisfaction(Up to 6 month)
- Tissue biotype(Up to 6 months)
- Bleeding on probing(Up to 6 months)
- Probing depth(Up to 6 months)