MedPath

Effectiveness of Picture Exchange Communication System on Gingival Health of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorders

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Interventions
Behavioral: Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS)
Registration Number
NCT03791385
Lead Sponsor
Jordan University of Science and Technology
Brief Summary

The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) is a communication system for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a PECS-based tooth-brushing program on gingival health in children with ASD and assess parents' perception of PECS. This was a prospective interventional study. Using PECS as a pictures/cards series showing a structured tooth-brushing method, 37 children with ASD (31 males, 6 females) (average age 9.49±4.10, 4-16 years) and their parents/caregivers were trained on tooth-brushing twice, two weeks apart. Data collected after examinations (baseline, 3, 6-months) included gingival and plaque indices (GI, PI) and two questionnaires (baseline, 6-months) for demographic data and parents' perception of PECS including: difficulty rating (easy, hard, very hard) and PECS usefulness.

Detailed Description

The need for improved oral hygiene routines in individuals with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) has been documented in many reports. The Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS), which is a series of pictures that show a structured method and technique for teeth brushing, was chosen for this study since it is a proven communication system for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD).

The aim of the study was to assess the effect of a PECS-based tooth-brushing program on gingival health in children with ASD and assess parents' perception of PECS.

This was a prospective interventional study. Using PECS as a pictures/cards series showing a structured tooth-brushing method, 37 children with ASD (31 males, 6 females) (average age 9.49±4.10, 4-16 years) and their parents/caregivers were trained on tooth-brushing twice, two weeks apart. The pictures were placed in the bathroom, at home and/or at the autism center. Data collected after examinations (baseline, 3, 6-months) included gingival and plaque indices (GI, PI) and two questionnaires (baseline, 6-months) for demographic data and parents' perception of PECS including: difficulty rating (easy, hard, very hard) and whether they found PECS useful in teaching their children how to brush their teeth (yes or no).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
37
Inclusion Criteria
  • Children diagnosed with ASD.
  • Age between 4 and 18 years old.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Children unable to cooperate for data collection (poor behavior during dental examination).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Study subjectsPicture Exchange Communication System (PECS)Children with ASD and their parents/caregivers were trained on tooth-brushing twice, two weeks apart using Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) PECS as a pictures/cards series showing a structured tooth-brushing method.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Plaque index score6 months

This score indicates the level of plaque (and reflects level of oral hygiene) upon examination of teeth, reported as the average score, calculated as (total score for all teeth/number of examined teeth): Score 0 (No plaque), Score 1 (Plaque not visible by eye, only detectable using a dental probe), Score 2 (Plaque visible by eye \& detectable with a dental probe along the gingival margin of the tooth), Score 4 (Thick layer of plaque visible by eye \& detectable by probe covering more than the gingival margin of the tooth). A lower score indicates less plaque (meaning better oral hygiene) and vice versa.

Gingival index score6 months

This score indicates the level of gingival inflammation upon examination of teeth, reported as the average score calculated as (total score for all teeth/number of examined teeth): Score 0 (Absence of inflammation), Score 1 (Mild inflammation: slight change in colour (more red) and little change in texture (loss of stippling), No bleeding on probing), Score 2 (Moderate inflammation: moderate glazing, redness, edema and hypertrophy; bleeding on probing), Score 3 (Severe inflammation: marked redness and edema; tendency to spontaneous bleeding; ulceration). A lower score indicates less gingival inflammation (better gingival health) and vice versa.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Parents' rating of PECS difficulty6 months

Parents were asked to rate PECS difficulty as: easy, hard, very hard. This was assessed through a questionnaire.

PECS usefulness6 months

Parents were asked whether PECS was useful in teaching their children how to brush their teeth: yes, no. This was assessed through a questionnaire.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Jordan University of Science and Technology

🇯🇴

Irbid, Jordan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath