Restoration of teeth with different ways of insertion and protection of restorative material
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Dental caries
- Registration Number
- RBR-2nwk89
- Lead Sponsor
- Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Data analysis completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- Not specified
Inclusion Criteria
Healthy volunteers; both genders; between 6 and 7 years of age; clinically presenting proximal caries lesion; lesion accessible to manual instruments used in atraumatic restorative treatment
Exclusion Criteria
Non-cooperative patients; restorations on the selected tooth; presence of fistula or abscess near the tooth selected to the research; presence of pulp exposure or mobility in the selected tooth
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Intervention
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical evaluation of restorations: the groups in which the glass ionomer cement (GIC) was inserted using the 2 layers technique should present superior longevity, since it is believed that the placement of a thin layer of flowable GIC may incur in smaller air bubbles formation between the material and the tooth, therefore minimizing the formation of weakness areas, which could concentrate energy and start a fracture, leading to marginal defects or loss of the restoration
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical evaluation of restorations: the groups of teeth that received the application of fluid resin with nanoparticles should have a superior clinical performance than those protected with petroleum jelly, since that in addition to protecting superficially the GIC from suffer syneresis or soaking water, it also would provide a more smoothness surface, which would result in higher resistance of the material, especially in proximal restorations