Mobile Critical Care Recovery Program for Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Acute Respiratory Failure; Post-Intensive Care Syndrome
• Interventions: Behavioral: Mobile Critical Care Program; Behavioral: Attention Control

• Registration Number: NCT03053245
• Lead Sponsor: Indiana University

Brief Summary

The m-CCRP randomized controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy of a collaborative critical care recovery program from acute respiratory failure (ARF) survivors in accomplishing the Institute of Healthcare Improvement's triple aims of better health, better care, at lower cost.

Primary Aim:

To assess the efficacy of m-CCRP in improving the QOL of ARF survivors compared to attention control at twelve months post hospital discharge.

Secondary Aims:

1. To evaluate the efficacy of m-CCRP in improving cognitive, physical, and psychological function of ARF survivors at twelve months post hospital discharge when compared to attention control.

2. To evaluate the efficacy of m-CCRP in reducing health-care utilization, defined as time from enrollment to emergency department visits and/or hospital re-admission, by ARF survivors as compared to attention control at twelve months post hospital discharge.

Detailed Description

Five million Americans require admission to intensive care units (ICU) annually due to life threatening illnesses, and this number is expected to rise.4 Two million of these ICU admissions are secondary to Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) with more than half requiring mechanical ventilation. Greater than 50% of the patients with ARF who survive their ICU stay suffer from long-term morbidity in the form of functional disability, cognitive disability, major or minor depression, and anxiety. These complications negatively impact the quality of life (QOL) of ARF survivors, interfere with their physical and emotional recovery, and lead to long-term disability with less than half of ARF survivors returning to the work force. Ongoing care for ARF survivors has been estimated to cost $3.5 million per ARF survivor at 1 year. This constellation of ICU sequelae with attendant morbidity has been designated as the post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). There are community resources and rehabilitation services available to ARF survivors, but the current fragmented nature of our healthcare system is unable to integrate and coordinate care in order to provide the most meaningful recovery.

The Institute of Medicine recommends the development of care coordination programs to deliver patient-centered and interdisciplinary-based medical care. Indiana University Center for Aging Research (IUCAR) has over 20 years of experience in delivering interdisciplinary, collaborative care through pragmatic interventions utilizing care coordinators. Care coordinator delivery models have improved care of patients with dementia, depression, functional decline and PICS. Our PICS clinic, the Critical Care Recovery Center (CCRC) was developed in 2011 to enhance cognitive, physical, and psychological recovery of ICU survivors.

Since then, CCRC has provided care to over 200 survivors with a high burden of PICS (88% had cognitive impairment; 60% had depression). CCRC showed feasibility and initial efficacy in managing PICS. However given its traditional outpatient clinic structure, CCRC has limited physical access to ARF survivors, leading to delayed evaluation and an added travel burden on ARF survivors. Building from the experience of the CCRC and our other successful care coordinator based programs; we now propose a mobile model of post-ICU collaborative care with greater access to enhance the recovery of ARF survivors.

The overarching aim of the proposed program is to improve the QOL of patients who survived an episode of ARF by maximizing their cognitive, physical, and psychological recovery utilizing a mobile care coordinator. The care coordinator will bring the intervention to the patient irrespective of the patient's physical location and will be supported by an interdisciplinary team of a critical care physician, a health services scientist, an ICU nurse, and a psychologist, with input from other consultants as needed. In addition, dynamic feedback through process measurement tools and care coordination support software will inform the recovery process. We propose to evaluate the efficacy of our collaborative care intervention termed the "Mobile Critical Care Recovery Program (m-CCRP)" through a randomized clinical trial among survivors of ARF.

Basic Information
|
Recruitment & Eligibility
|
Study & Design
|
Trial Locations

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2017-02-01
• Study First Submitted QC: 2017-02-10
• Study First Posted: 2017-02-15
• Study Start: 2017-03-01
• Primary Completion: 2022-10-31
• Study Completion: 2022-10-31
• Results First Submitted: 2024-04-10
• Status Verified: 2024-06
• Results First Submitted QC: 2024-06-19
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-06-19
• Results First Posted: 2024-06-24
• Last Update Posted: 2024-06-24

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 503

Inclusion Criteria

• At least 18 years of age
• Hospitalized in the ICU
• Diagnosed with Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF) requiring greater than or equal to 24 hours of mechanical ventilation or noninvasive positive pressure ventilation or high flow nasal canula.
• Discharged to home, skilled nursing facility, sub-acute rehabilitation care, or long-term acute care
• English speaking
• Able to consent either in-person or through legally authorized representative
• Have access to a telephone

Read More

Exclusion Criteria

• Hospitalized to a regular non-ICU ward
• Diagnosis of cancer with life expectancy less than 1 year
• Admitted with ischemic or hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident, traumatic brain injury, or undergoing neurosurgery
• History of dementing illnesses and other neurodegenerative disease such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, or vascular dementia
• Unable to complete study questionnaire due to severe hearing loss
• Legally blind
• Pregnant (assessed by urine pregnancy test) or nursing
• Living outside the greater Indianapolis area
• Recent history of alcohol or substance abuse
• Status post tracheostomy and not eligible for a speaking valve
• Incarcerated at the time of study enrollment
• Schizophrenia or bipolar disorder (confirmed by EMR)
• Homelessness
• Illiterate

Read More

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Mobile Critical Care Recovery Program	Mobile Critical Care Program	The group will receive the Mobile Critical Care Recovery Program (m-CCRP) intervention which includes care coordination and collaborative care model for one year post enrollment.
Attention Control	Attention Control	The attention control group will receive telephone based check ins related to their health from the research study team.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Self Reported Quality of Life PCS: Physical Component Score at 1 Year	1 year	Utilizing SF-36 The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) consists of eight domains. It yields two summary scores (PCS: physical component score, and MCS: mental component score). MCS and PCS range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better health status. A difference of 2 or more points is considered clinically meaningful for both the PCS and MCS subscales of SF-36.
Cognitive Assessment Score at 1 Year	1 year	Utilizing RBANS: Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.; The overall RBANS z-score is the mean of the 7-item (RBANS subscale) z-scores that could be collected in person and by phone. The 7 subscales are: List Learning, Story Memory, Semantic fluency, Digit Span, List Recall, List Recognition, Story Recall.; A Z-Score of 0 is the population mean. Values above 0 represent better outcomes.
Self Reported Quality of Life MCS: Mental Component Score at 1 Year	1 year	Utilizing SF-36 The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) consists of eight domains. It yields two summary scores (PCS: physical component score, and MCS: mental component score). MCS and PCS range from 0 to 100, and higher scores indicate better health status. A difference of 2 or more points is considered clinically meaningful for both the PCS and MCS subscales of SF-36.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Depression Symptoms at 1 Year	1 year	PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) Scores range from 0 to 27 on the PHQ-9 with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression.
Physical Performance at 1 Year	1 year	Utilizing SPPB The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) will measure physical training effects on balance and strength.; Ranges from 0-12: higher score is better outcome
Anxiety Symptoms at 1 Year	1 year	GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7) Scores range from 0 to 21 on the GAD-7 with higher scores greater anxiety.

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

University Hospital; 🇺🇸 Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Eskenazi Hospital; 🇺🇸 Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Methodist Hospital; 🇺🇸 Indianapolis, Indiana, United States