Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00734409
NCT00734409
Completed
N/A

Combining Objective and Subjective Sedation Assessment Tools - Second Study

Duke University1 site in 1 country300 target enrollmentMay 2008

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Critical Illness
Sponsor
Duke University
Enrollment
300
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Mean Sedative Use
Status
Completed
Last Updated
13 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of a device called the BIS monitor in addition to the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale will give better assessment of a subject's level of sedation.

Detailed Description

Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) who require a ventilator to help them breathe also require sedation in order to keep them comfortable and prevent injury. The national guidelines for sedation management include a daily interruption of sedation performed once each morning. To determine the amount of sedation needed, the current standard practice is to use a system called the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). The patient is stimulated by calling their name or by tapping their shoulder until the patient's responses indicate that a satisfactory level of sedation has been achieved. The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of a device called the BIS monitor in addition to the RASS will give better assessment of a subject's level of sedation. The BIS monitor is a sensor strip taped to the forehead and attached to a device that reads electrical activity from the brain. It is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for monitoring patients under sedation.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 2008
End Date
July 2011
Last Updated
13 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patient in the ICU
  • continuous IV sedation with propofol midazolam or dexmedetomidine
  • age \> 18
  • expected to require mechanical ventilation for \>=48 hours

Exclusion Criteria

  • prisoners
  • no available space on forehead
  • continuous electroencephalography(EEG) monitoring
  • bifrontal brain injury
  • barbiturate coma therapy
  • known hypersensitivity to study medications
  • high risk for ethanol (ETOH) withdrawal
  • resuscitation from cardiac arrest without recovery of mental status
  • moribund clinical state (death expected within 48 hours)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Mean Sedative Use

Time Frame: Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay through discharge

The mean amount of propofol used on each patient while the patient was in the ICU and receiving mechanical ventilation.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Unplanned Self-device Removal Events(ICU stay through discharge)
  • Mean Days on Mechanical Ventilation(ICU stay- through discharge)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials