Comparison Between TMJ Arthrocentesis Using the Dental Implant Motor Irrigation Pump and the Conventional Technique in Treatment of Internal Derangement
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 30
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Change in pain scores
研究概览
简要总结
Background: Millions of individuals worldwide suffer from temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders and are characterized by pain and joint dysfunction. TMJ internal derangement (ID) is the most frequent type of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs). TMJ arthrocentesis represents a form of minimally invasive surgical treatment in patients suffering from internal derangement of the TMJ Aim of the study: To clinically compare between the effect of TMJ arthrocentesis under high hydraulic pressure by dental implant motor and the conventional method in treatment of TMJ internal derangement regarding pain and mandibular movements.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 16 Years 至 —（Child, Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •TMJ internal derangement with reduction.
- •Both genders.
排除标准
- •Patients with overlying infection or cellulitis
- •Relevant systemic disease
- •Previous TMJ surgery.
研究组 & 干预措施
implant motor irrigation II
干预措施: Motor irrigation with 40% power (Other)
Conventional arthrocentesis
干预措施: conventional TMJ arthrocentesis (Other)
implant motor irrigation I
干预措施: Motor irrigation with 80% power (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Change in pain scores
时间窗: 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months
a 10 point visual analogue scale (VAS)\*. (0-1=none, 2-4=mild, 5-7=moderate, 8-10=severe) .
Change in mouth opening
时间窗: baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks, 3 months
The patient's maximum mouth opening (MMO) value will be measured by taking the average of three consecutive measurements of the distance between the maxilla and mandible mid-central incisive teeth with the Endo ruler after the patients were asked to open
次要结局
- change in mandibular movements(baseline, 1 week, 3 months)
- post operative edema(1 week)