Comparative study of analgesic quality in two methods of bilateral ilioinguinal block and caudal block
Phase 3
- Conditions
- Bilateral inguinal hernia surgery.
- Registration Number
- IRCT20200521047530N3
- Lead Sponsor
- Tehran University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 66
Inclusion Criteria
All children from 3 to 8 years old
Candidate for bilateral inguinal hernia surgery
Under general anesthesia
ASA class 1 and 2
Exclusion Criteria
Allergy to local anesthetics
Non-Persian speaking patients
Sacral infection
Coagulation disorders
History of seizures
Weight more than 20 kg
Patients who are being treated with a variety of painkillers and psychiatric medications for any reason
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain score based on CHEOPS criteria. Timepoint: After the patient enters the recovery ward, the pain score is recorded. Method of measurement: Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale.;PAED Delirium Score. Timepoint: After the patient enters the recovery ward, it is recorded. Method of measurement: It is obtained based on The Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium criteria.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Recovery time. Timepoint: It is recorded and calculated between the time the patient enters the recovery ward and the patient leaves it. Method of measurement: It is recorded and calculated between the time the patient enters the recovery ward and the patient leaves it.;Need for additional drugs (fentanyl). Timepoint: Additional dose of fentanyl prescribed after surgical incision or in the recovery ward. Method of measurement: Additional dose of fentanyl prescribed after surgical incision or in the recovery ward in micrograms per kilogram.