Testicular Sperm Aspiration (TESA) vs. Microfluidic Sperm Separation (MSS) in Couples With High Sperm DNA Fragmentation Undergoing ICSI: Which Approach is Better
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 280
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Clinical Pregnancy Rate
研究概览
简要总结
Normal embryonic development relies on the correct transmission of genetic information, and sperm DNA plays a crucial part in this process. Causes of poor sperm DNA integrity include unhealthy lifestyles such as smoking and exposure to gonadotoxins, as well as, obesity, varicoceles, infections, advanced paternal age and systemic disorders. An increase in DNA fragmentation in sperm has been linked to lower fertilisation rate, poorer quality embryos, lower pregnancy rate, and high miscarriages rate.
The best way for sperm selection and processing in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) should be noninvasive and cost-effective. It should also make it possible to identify high-quality spermatozoa and produce more favorable results in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates.7 Meanwhile, the microfluidic sperm separation technology is a less expensive and less invasive alternative. This method allows for the selection of motile sperm that have a normal morphology, low levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and low DFI
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Retrospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- Male
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Men with high DNA fragmentation (>20%) undergoing TESA-ICSI or Zymot-ICSI
排除标准
- •Spouse with advanced maternal age (> 40 years)
- •Egg donation cycle
结局指标
主要结局
Clinical Pregnancy Rate
时间窗: approximately 8 weeks
Compare clinical pregnancy rate in couples with high Sperm DNA fragmentation
次要结局
- Number of utilizable blastocysts obtained(Approximately 20 days)
