MedPath

Comparison of Olopatadine 0.6% and Fluticasone Proprionate 50mcg Nasal Sprays in a Two Week Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Trial

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00691665
Lead Sponsor
Alcon Research
Brief Summary

Comparison of two nasal sprays for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
130
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6%Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6%Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6% 2 sprays per nostril twice daily
Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 mcgFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 mcgFluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 mcg 2 sprays per nostril once daily
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Mean Percent Change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) From Baseline14 Days minus baseline

Responses to patient-completed diaries for reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS). TNSS is composed of 4 individual assessments, which included runny nose, itchy nose, stuffy nose, and sneezing; each of the 4 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 4 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TNSS score), the maximum of which could be 12. Reflective scores were assessed from the hour since the last dose of study medication.

Mean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) From Baseline14 days minus baseline

Responses to patient-completed diaries for instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Scores (iTNSS). TNSS is composed of 4 individual assessments, which included runny nose, itchy nose, stuffy nose, and sneezing; each of the 4 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 4 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TNSS score), the maximum of which could be 12. Instantaneous scores were assessed at the time of daily dosing.

Mean Percent Change in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS) From Baseline14 Days minus baseline

Responses to patient-completed diaries for reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS). TOSS is composed of 3 individual assessments of ocular symptoms (itching/burning, tearing/watering, redness) each of the 3 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 3 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TOSS score), the maximum of which could be 9. Reflective scores were assessed from the hour since the last dose of study medication.

Mean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS) From Baseline14 Days minus baseline

Responses to patient-completed diaries for instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS). TOSS is composed of 3 individual assessments of ocular symptoms (itching/burning, tearing/watering, redness) each of the 3 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 3 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TOSS score), the maximum of which could be 9. Instantaneous scores were assessed at the time of daily dosing.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sacramento, CA

🇺🇸

Sacramento, California, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath