Comparison of Olopatadine 0.6% and Fluticasone Proprionate 50mcg Nasal Sprays in a Two Week Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Trial
- Conditions
- Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00691665
- Lead Sponsor
- Alcon Research
- Brief Summary
Comparison of two nasal sprays for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 130
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6% Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6% Olopatadine HCL Nasal Spray, 0.6% 2 sprays per nostril twice daily Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 mcg Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 mcg Fluticasone Propionate Nasal Spray, 50 mcg 2 sprays per nostril once daily
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean Percent Change in Reflective Total Nasal Symptom Score (rTNSS) From Baseline 14 Days minus baseline Responses to patient-completed diaries for reflective Total Nasal Symptom Scores (rTNSS). TNSS is composed of 4 individual assessments, which included runny nose, itchy nose, stuffy nose, and sneezing; each of the 4 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 4 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TNSS score), the maximum of which could be 12. Reflective scores were assessed from the hour since the last dose of study medication.
Mean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Score (iTNSS) From Baseline 14 days minus baseline Responses to patient-completed diaries for instantaneous Total Nasal Symptom Scores (iTNSS). TNSS is composed of 4 individual assessments, which included runny nose, itchy nose, stuffy nose, and sneezing; each of the 4 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 4 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TNSS score), the maximum of which could be 12. Instantaneous scores were assessed at the time of daily dosing.
Mean Percent Change in Reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS) From Baseline 14 Days minus baseline Responses to patient-completed diaries for reflective Total Ocular Symptom Scores (rTOSS). TOSS is composed of 3 individual assessments of ocular symptoms (itching/burning, tearing/watering, redness) each of the 3 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 3 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TOSS score), the maximum of which could be 9. Reflective scores were assessed from the hour since the last dose of study medication.
Mean Percent Change in Instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS) From Baseline 14 Days minus baseline Responses to patient-completed diaries for instantaneous Total Ocular Symptom Scores (iTOSS). TOSS is composed of 3 individual assessments of ocular symptoms (itching/burning, tearing/watering, redness) each of the 3 assessments were rated using a 4 point scale that ranged in whole units from 0 (none) to 3 (severe). All 3 assessments are then added together for a composite score (TOSS score), the maximum of which could be 9. Instantaneous scores were assessed at the time of daily dosing.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Sacramento, CA
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States