Mental Practice and Manipulative Skills Training in Multiple Sclerosis
- Conditions
- Multiple Sclerosis
- Interventions
- Other: Mental practiceOther: Mental practice + skill trainingOther: Control group
- Registration Number
- NCT04325074
- Lead Sponsor
- Cristina García-Bravo
- Brief Summary
Introduction: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a demyelinating disease of the central nervous system which produces both motor and cognitive dysfunctions. MS causes a decline in the performance of activities of daily living (ADL) due to impairments affecting limb function.
Aim: This pilot study sought to determine whether the use of mental practice (MP) or the combined use of MP and the training of manipulative skills would improve the manipulation motor skills and treatment satisfaction among people with MS.
Methods: The study participants were people with MS. Blinded evaluators performed three assessments for each patient (pre-treatment, post-treatment and at a three month follow up). The patients were divided into three groups with alternate allocation: (A) Mental practice, (B) Mental practice + skills training and (C) Control group.
Keywords: activities of daily living; manual dexterity; mental practice, motor image; multiple sclerosis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 40
- patients diagnosed with MS of the RRMS and SPMS subtypes, without the presence of flare-ups during the past three months and aged between 25 and 60 years;
- an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of ≤7,
- not presenting depressive symptoms (measured using the Beck Depression Inventory, BDI),
- not presenting cognitive decline, measured using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) or Minimental Status Examination.
- In addition, they had to be regularly attending physical therapy and/or occupational therapy rehabilitation treatments.
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Mental practice Mental practice The final sample therefore comprised of 35 participants (n=35), who were divided into three treatment groups. The sample of mental practice group was n=12. Mental practice + skill training Mental practice + skill training The final sample therefore comprised of 35 participants (n=35), who were divided into three treatment groups. The sample of mental practice + skills training group was n=13. Control group Control group The final sample therefore comprised of 35 participants (n=35), who were divided into three treatment groups. The sample of control group was n=10.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Pre-treatment Pre-treatment assessments were performed with each patient. The higher scores mean a better outcome.
Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT). Pre-treatment Pre-treatment assessments were performed with each patient. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Box and Block Test (BBT). Pre-treatment Pre-treatment assessments were performed with each patient. The higher scores mean a better outcome.
The ABILHAND questionnaire. Pre-treatment Pre-treatment assessments were performed with each patient. The higher scores mean a better outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT). Post-treatment Immediately after treatment assessments were performed with each patient. The higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Box and Block Test (BBT). Post-treatment Immediately after treatment assessments were performed with each patient. The higher scores mean a better outcome.
The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). Post-treatment Immediately after treatment assessments were performed with each patient. The higher scores mean a better outcome.
The ABILHAND questionnaire. Post-treatment Immediately after treatment assessments were performed with each patient. The higher scores mean a better outcome.