CTRI/2022/01/039312
Recruiting
Phase 3
Comparative evaluation of direct laryngoscope using macintosh blade with VBM laryngoscope during rapid sequence induction in patients undergoing emergency surgery
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Not specified
- Sponsor
- PGIMER
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •ASA grade I,II,III
- •Patients posted for emergency gastrointestinal surgery undergoing rapid sequence induction technique
Exclusion Criteria
- •Denial to part of study
- •Disease with abnormalities of neck,larynx,pharynx, oesophagus or thyroid
- •Anticipated or predicted difficult airway
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Not specified
Similar Trials
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
IT IS A COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN DIRECT LARYNGOSCOPY AND VIDEO LARYNGOSCOPYIN ADULT PATIENTS REQUIRING TRACHEAL INTUBATION .CTRI/2023/09/057483Department of Anaesthesiology IPGMER KOLKATA
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of direct laryngoscopy versus Glidescope for the purpose of laryngoscopy management and intubation in candidates of caesarean deliveryElective cesarean section.Delivery by elective caesarean sectionO82.0IRCT20200825048515N44Esfahan University of Medical Sciences90
Recruiting
Not Applicable
A study on use of videolaryngoscope and conventional laryngoscope for insertion of endotracheal tube in mannequin by medical studentsCTRI/2017/11/010491Ramaiah Medical College and Hospitals
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A Comparative study of Laryngoscope guided and Blind insertion techniques of Laryngeal Mask Airway Proseal in ChildreHealth Condition 1: R688- Other general symptoms and signsCTRI/2022/04/042024VMMC and Safdarjung Hospital
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Video Laryngoscope versus Direct Laryngoscope and postoperative sore throatACTRN12624000805572Western Sydney Local Health Disctrict100