跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07574112
NCT07574112已完成不适用

Muscle Energy Technique With And Without Myofascial Release in Patients With Cervicogenic Headache

University of Lahore1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2025年2月25日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
40
试验地点
1

研究概览

简要总结

This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) with and without Myofascial Release (MFR) in patients with cervicogenic headache. Forty participants aged 20-40 years were randomly assigned into two groups: MET only and MET combined with MFR. The intervention was delivered over five sessions across two weeks. Outcomes included pain intensity (VAS), cervical range of motion, and disability (Neck Disability Index), assessed at baseline and post-intervention. The study evaluated which intervention produced greater improvements in pain, function, and cervical mobility.

详细描述

This randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare the effects of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) with and without Myofascial Release (MFR) in patients with cervicogenic headache. Cervicogenic headache is a secondary headache arising from dysfunctions of the cervical spine and associated muscular structures.

A total of 40 participants aged between 20 and 40 years were recruited and randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A received Muscle Energy Technique alone, while Group B received a combination of Muscle Energy Technique and Myofascial Release. The intervention was delivered over five treatment sessions within a period of two weeks.

Outcome measures included pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), cervical range of motion measured with a goniometer, and functional disability assessed using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Assessments were performed at baseline and after completion of the intervention period.

The objective of the study was to determine whether the addition of Myofascial Release to Muscle Energy Technique provides superior improvements in pain reduction, cervical mobility, and functional disability compared to Muscle Energy Technique alone in patients with cervicogenic headache.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Participants aged 20 to 40 years
  • Diagnosed with cervicogenic headache
  • Both male and female participants
  • Participants willing to participate in the study

排除标准

  • History of cervical fracture or surgery
  • Neurological disorders affecting the cervical region
  • Severe cervical spine pathology
  • Participants receiving other forms of manual therapy

研究者

发起方
University of Lahore
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Zunaira Samreen

Principal Investigator

University of Lahore

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验