Multicomponent vs Pilates on Mass, Strength, and Physical Performance in Older Adults

Not Applicable

Not yet recruiting

• Conditions: Muscle Mass; Muscle Strength; Physical Performance

• Registration Number: NCT06719505
• Lead Sponsor: Universidade Estadual do Norte do Parana

Brief Summary

Introduction: The aging process can result in several physiological changes, such as the loss of muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance, collectively defined as sarcopenia. Sarcopenia is considered one of the primary health challenges among older adults. To prevent this condition and improve related health outcomes, regular physical exercise is the most recommended strategy, with multicomponent exercises being particularly effective for older individuals. Pilates is another potential form of physical exercise that has gained popularity among older adults seeking to improve muscle mass, strength, and physical performance. However, significant gaps remain in the literature, with a notable lack of studies evaluating the efficacy of Pilates in improving sarcopenic outcomes. Objective: To compare the efficacy of multicomponent training programs versus Pilates in improving muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in older adults. Methods: A total of 100 older adults aged 60 to 80 years, of both sexes, will be randomized into two intervention groups: the Multicomponent Training Group (n=50) and the Pilates Group (n=50). Evaluations will be conducted at three time points: baseline (before the intervention), mid-treatment (3 months), and post-treatment (6 months). The following instruments will be used: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) will be used to assess muscle mass. Muscle strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer for the lower limbs and a handgrip dynamometer for the upper limbs. Physical performance will be assessed through the Brazilian version of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), the gait speed test, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The Feeling Scale will be applied to determine the affective valence of the exercise programs. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be performed to check the normality of the data, Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test will be used depending on whether the distribution is parametric or non-parametric, and ANCOVA will be used to compare the groups post-intervention, considering a 95% confidence interval (p\<0.05). The data will be analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software.

Detailed Description

The sample will consist of 100 elderly individuals of both sexes, aged between 60 and 80 years. The sample size calculation for this study was performed using the Bioestat 5.3 program, based on the values of whole-body DEXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) assessment, provided in a previous study (Seo et al., 2021). In this case, the post-intervention mean and standard deviation between the Resistance Training group (1566.75±189.47) and the Control group (maintaining routine habits) (1446.86 ± 206.42) were used, with a test power of 80%, an alpha value of 0.05, and a 15% error rate, which indicated the need for 50 participants in each group (Multicomponent Group and Pilates Group). Descriptive data analysis will be expressed as mean, standard deviation, and percentage delta of the difference. Normality will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. To verify if there are differences between the groups regarding baseline characteristics (age, weight, height, and BMI) at the pre-intervention stage, Student's t-test for independent samples or the Mann-Whitney U test will be used, depending on whether the data are parametric or non-parametric. To compare the groups post-intervention, ANCOVA will be used, with baseline data as covariates. If the data exhibit non-parametric characteristics, the Mann-Whitney U test will be applied to compare the groups based on the difference between pre- and post-intervention. A confidence interval of 95% (p\<0.05) will be accepted. Data will be processed using SPSS 25.0 software. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) will be calculated and classified as small (0.20), medium (0.50), or large (0.80). For effect size calculations, the GPower 3.1 program will be used.

Study Timeline

• Status Verified: 2024-12
• Study First Submitted: 2024-12-02
• Study First Submitted QC: 2024-12-02
• Study First Posted: 2024-12-05
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-12-09
• Last Update Posted: 2024-12-13
• Study Start: 2025-05
• Primary Completion: 2025-12
• Study Completion: 2026-02

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 100

Inclusion Criteria

• Not currently participating in a physical training program for at least six months;
• No medical restrictions for physical activity and physical tests;
• Achieve a score of 19 or higher on the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Exclusion Criteria

• Individuals with severe/disabling musculoskeletal and/or neurological dysfunctions;
• Neurological disorders or cognitive impairment;
• Use of supplements for muscle mass increase;
• History of recent fractures or surgeries and severe cardiorespiratory diseases.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
1. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)	6 months	A high-precision reference standard used to measure lean muscle mass. The values will be calculated by the ratio of appendicular lean mass divided by the square of height in meters, with values lower than 7 kg/m² for men and 5.5 kg/m² for women confirming the diagnosis of low lean mass.
2. Biodex Isokinetic Dynamometer System	6 months	Evaluation of isokinetic muscle strength of the knee extensors and flexors. The assessment consists of knee extension and flexion (concentric/concentric) at an angular velocity of 60°/s, starting with the knee flexed at 90°. Three sets of five repetitions will be performed with a 30-second rest interval between sets, and the same procedure will be carried out with the left leg.
3. Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer	6 months	Evaluation of handgrip strength. The best value from three attempts will be used for each hand.
4. Brazilian Version of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)	6 months	A battery of tests to assess physical performance, including balance, gait speed, and chair rise tests. It has predictive validity and clinical applicability.
5. Gait Speed Test: Evaluation of gait speed through the 4-meter Walking Speed Test and the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)	6 months	The 4-meter Walking Speed Test is used as a short-distance gait speed test, measuring habitual or maximum speed manually with a stopwatch or electronically with a device to measure the individual's walking time over a four-meter course. The 6MWT is a submaximal measure of aerobic capacity. Both tests are used to assess physical performance
6. Timed Up and Go (TUG)	6 months	A test used to assess physical function, commonly employed to evaluate the risk of falls. For the test, the time it takes for participants to rise from a chair, walk at a comfortable pace in a straight line for three meters, turn around, and return to the chair to sit down will be timed.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
7. Simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia (SARC-F)	6 months	It is a validated and consistent questionnaire to identify people at risk of adverse outcomes due to sarcopenia. It consists of 5 items, self-reported by patients, based on the individual's perception of their strength limitations, ability to walk, get up from a chair, climb stairs and history of falls. Each item can be scored from 0 to 2, with 0 being no difficulty, 1 being some difficulty, and 2 being very difficult or unable to perform. In the falls item, 0 corresponds to no falls, 1 corresponds to 1 to 3 falls and 2 corresponds to 4 or more falls. The final score can range from 0 to 10, with a score of 4 being considered predictive of sarcopenia.
8. Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)	6 months	A screening tool for the nutritional status of participants, consisting of simple measures and six questions that can be answered in less than 5 minutes. It includes anthropometric measurements (body mass index, weight loss), global assessment (mobility), and dietary questionnaire and subjective evaluation (food intake, neuropsychological issues, acute illness). A score between 12-14 points indicates normal nutrition, 8-11 points indicates a risk of malnutrition, and 0-7 points indicates malnutrition.
9. Feeling Scale - Pleasure and Displeasure during Exercise	6 months	The affective valence scale will be used to measure participants' feelings of pleasure/affect related to the exercises. The score ranges from +5, indicating pleasure during exercise with a feeling of "very good," to -5, indicating displeasure with a feeling of "very bad" during exercise execution. The closer the score is to +5, the more pleasure the participant experiences while performing the exercise.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Universidade; 🇧🇷 Jacarezinho, Paraná, Brazil