Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05607433
NCT05607433Not yet recruitingNot Applicable

Air Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway (Air QILA) Versus the AmbuAura Gain as a Conduit for Endotracheal Intubation Assisted by Tube Exchanger, a Randomized Comparative Study.

Cairo University2 sites in 1 country44 target enrollmentStarted: November 2022Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Enrollment
44
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Total endotracheal intubation time

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The study aims to compare the efficacy of the Ambu AuraGain to that of the Air Q ILA as a conduit for endotracheal intubation assisted by tube exchanger. The comparison will be in terms of total intubation time, success rate of insertion of the tube exchanger as well as endotracheal intubation and complications.

Detailed Description

Very few studies discussed assisted endotrachealc intubation using certain tools as bougie through the Air Q ILA .

the hypothesis in this study is that the use of flexible, small calibre tube exchanger introduced through both supraglottic devices into the trachea as guidance for endotracheal intubation, will have shorter intubation time with the Ambu AuraGain than the Air Q ILA and less complications in both devices.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

only participants will be masked

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 60 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age : 18 to 60
  • ASA physical status 1 and 2
  • body weight less than 90 kilos
  • Ganzouri airway score less than or equal to 3.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Active respiratory or cardiac disease
  • Any expected airway difficulties
  • Craniofacial abnormalities or fractures
  • patients with abnormal coagulation profile

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Total endotracheal intubation time

Time Frame: time of tube exchanger insertion and endotracheal tube insertion

tube exchanger intubation time plus endotracheal intubation time

Secondary Outcomes

  • Tube exchanger insertion time(from disconnection of the supraglottic device from ventilator to successful insertion of tube exchanger in trachea)
  • success rate of endotracheal intubation(1 second after insertion tube exchanger until successful endotracheal intubation)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Hoda Zakaria Saleh Hassan Alrify

assistant lecturer of anesthesia

Cairo University

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials