Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01961934
NCT01961934
Withdrawn
Phase 2

Carbon-11-Sodium Acetate Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Imaging Evaluation in Brain Glioma, Post Therapy Necrosis and Pseudo-progression

Phoenix Molecular Imaging1 site in 1 countryMay 2014

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Sodium Acetate C11 PET/CT Imaging
Conditions
Gliomas
Sponsor
Phoenix Molecular Imaging
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Biopsy Correlation
Status
Withdrawn
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study will investigate how well Carbon Acetate PET/CT imaging helps to correctly identify recurrent tumor versus post treatment effects (radionecrosis) in patients with previously treated high grade brain gliomas.

Detailed Description

The study is designed to investigate the effectiveness of Carbon Acetate PET/CT (AC PET)in terms of its ability to distinguish between radionecrosis/pseudo-progression and viable tumor in patients previously treated with surgery and radiation for high grade glioma brain tumors. Eligible patients with biopsy proven high grade gliomas (WHO grades 3 and 4) status-post prior cranial irradiation for this tumor; age 18 to 70; ECOG/Zubrod of 0-2, no other contraindications to trial entry, and a post-irradiation cranial MRI or CT demonstrating an enhancing lesion of uncertain etiology (not biopsied) will be treated with at least two weeks of steroidal therapy. Responders to steroidal therapy will be classified as either pseudo-progression (if asymptomatic) or radionecrosis (if symptomatic). Non-responders (those who do not respond clinically, radiographically, or both) will be referred for an FDG PET/CT and initial AC PET/CT within 3 weeks, and subsequently referred for stereotactic biopsy of their lesion followed by focal laser treatment (in the same operative setting) within 3 weeks of AC PET/CT. Specific Goals/Questions: 1. What is the yield (sensitivity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive value) of state-of-the-art PET/CT with C-11 Acetate in detecting recurrent disease versus post treatment effects and pseudo-progression in this patient population? 2. How does the performance of PET with C-11 Acetate compare with that of PET using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) and with that of MRI? 3. Evaluate the optimal timing for post injection imaging.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
May 2014
End Date
May 2018
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Fabio Almeida MD

Medical Director/PI

Phoenix Molecular Imaging

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients age 18-70
  • Pathologically confirmed World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 or 4 glioma
  • ECOG/Zubrod 0-2
  • Prior external beam radiotherapy to 59.4-60 Gray by 1.8-2 Gy fractions
  • Post-radiotherapy contrast-enhanced cranial MRI obtained at least 6 weeks after the completion of external beam radiotherapy shows enhancing anomaly (recurrent/progressive tumor versus pseudo-progression versus radionecrosis)
  • Patient completed at least a two week course of palliative steroid therapy for this enhancing anomaly
  • No prior designated therapy other than steroids for presumed radionecrosis or recurrent tumor
  • Patient with no clinical and/or radiological response to steroid therapy
  • Patient eligible for stereotactic brain biopsy
  • Patient eligible for focal laser therapy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients under the age of 18 years
  • Claustrophobic patients

Arms & Interventions

Sodium Acetate C11 PET/CT Imaging

Intervention: Sodium Acetate C11 PET/CT Imaging

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Biopsy Correlation

Time Frame: 3 weeks from AC PET Imaging

AC PET imaging results will be correlated with tissue biopsy results

Secondary Outcomes

  • SUV (Standardized Uptake Value)(Day 1 - Assess at time of PET imaging)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials