A Randomized Control Trial Testing Connective Tissue Grafts vs. Allograft on Dental Implants
- Conditions
- Dental Implant Soft Tissue Defects in the Anterior Maxilla
- Registration Number
- NCT01934530
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Michigan
- Brief Summary
This randomized controlled clinical pilot trial compared the efficacy of two soft tissue grafting methods for correcting esthetic discrepancies associated with non-molar implants in the maxilla. Specifically, it was explored whether defects treated with connective tissue grafts (SCTG) differed in their outcomes from defects treated with acellular dermal matrix allografts (ADM).
- Detailed Description
Thirteen patients who presented with implants displaying recession, thin biotype, concavity defects or a combination thereof associated with single crowned dental implants participated in this randomized control trial. The control group (N=7) received SCTG and the test group (N=6) received ADM, both under coronally positioned flaps. Data were collected before surgery, and 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after the surgery. Outcome measures included soft tissue, hard tissue, and esthetics parameters and psychosocial data.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 13
- Healthy adults of at least 18 years of age
- Maxillary non-molar implant with failing pink esthetic profile
- Implants with adjacent landmarks (only one can be an implant)
- Healthy implants measured by the lack of peri-implantitis and mucositis
- Good oral hygiene.
- Unstable systemic diseases, compromised immune system, or unstable bleeding disorders
- History of radiation or cancer in the oral cavity
- Use of IV bisphosphonate or steroid medication
- Use of tobacco products (>1/2 pack per day)
- Pregnancy
- Mucogingival surgery or implant placement within the past six months
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Recession Correction 6 Months Change in recession was recorded at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after grafting.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Concavity Correction 6 Months At baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after grafting, buccal concavities were measured.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University of Michigan
🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
University of Michigan🇺🇸Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States